Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):573.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79796-9.

Intentional synchronisation affects automatic imitation and source memory

Affiliations

Intentional synchronisation affects automatic imitation and source memory

Liam Cross et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Acting in synchrony is a fundamental part of many social interactions and can have pro-social consequences. Explanations for this relationship were investigated here using implicit measures of imitation (automatic imitation task) and memory (preference overlap task). In Study 1, participants performed an intentional synchronisation task where they moved sliders in or out of time with another person while a third person observed. Those who had moved in synchrony showed a stronger tendency to imitate their partner's actions than those who had moved in a non-synchronous way. Similarly, coordinated partners were also more likely to share object preferences. Results also showed that rather than memory blurring between co-actors, participants had improved memories for the self. Study 2 exchanged intentional for incidental coordination (coordinating with a synchronous metronome). None of the findings from Study 1 replicated when synchronisation was incidental rather than intentional, suggesting that having a shared goal may be critical for triggering effects of synchronisation on imitation tendencies and memory. Together these findings favour explanations related to changes in social categorisation over representational overlap between co-actors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The slider board.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example frames from the videos used in the automatic imitation task.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example items from the preference overlap task.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McNeill WH. Keeping Together in Time: Dance and Drill in Human History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1995.
    1. Strogatz S. Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order. London: Penguin Books; 2003.
    1. Keller PE, Novembre G, Hove MJ. Rhythm in joint action: Psychological and neurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2014;369:20130394. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0394. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kelso JS. Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organisation of Brain and Behavior. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1995.
    1. Reddish P, Fischer R, Bulbulia J. Let's dance together: Synchrony, shared intentionality and cooperation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e71182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071182. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types