Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones: a retrospective analysis of 417 cases
- PMID: 3343734
- DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42507-9
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones: a retrospective analysis of 417 cases
Abstract
We treated 417 patients with upper ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. All patients with obstructing stones underwent retrograde manipulation, which was successful in 57 per cent. Management of obstructing stones in situ (215 patients) with and without decompression of the collecting system required additional treatments in 13 per cent and ancillary procedures in 25 per cent. Nonocclusive ureteral stones were not manipulated. Treatment of these stones in situ slightly increased the need for postoperative ancillary procedures, compared to successful repositioning into the kidney (5.9 versus 3 per cent). Secondary treatments, however, were necessary as often as with occlusive stones. The main reason for failure of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy was the lack of fluid around an impacted stone. An energy absorptive effect of muscle tissue for stones projecting on the psoas muscle could not be demonstrated. The best and most consistent results were obtained when the stone was manipulated successfully into the renal collecting system.
Similar articles
-
Ureteral stone manipulation before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.J Urol. 1988 Jan;139(1):33-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42281-6. J Urol. 1988. PMID: 3336100 Clinical Trial.
-
Management of upper ureteral calculi with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.J Urol. 1987 Oct;138(4):720-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43351-9. J Urol. 1987. PMID: 3656518
-
Treatment of ureteral calculi by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy at a multi-use center.J Urol. 1988 Jun;139(6):1192-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42856-4. J Urol. 1988. PMID: 3373584
-
Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of middle ureteral stones: are ureteral stents necessary?Urology. 1995 Nov;46(5):649-52. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80294-5. Urology. 1995. PMID: 7495114 Review.
-
Contemporary management of ureteral stones.Urol Clin North Am. 1997 Feb;24(1):59-70. doi: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70354-2. Urol Clin North Am. 1997. PMID: 9048852 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of Shock Waves on Expression of IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, and TNF-α Expression by Human Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts: An In Vitro Study.Med Sci Monit. 2016 Mar 20;22:914-21. doi: 10.12659/msm.897507. Med Sci Monit. 2016. PMID: 26994898 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of hydronephrosis on treatment outcome of solitary proximal ureteral stone after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008 Oct;24(10):507-13. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70009-9. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008. PMID: 19181581 Free PMC article.
-
ESWL '90--state of the art. Limitations and future trends of shock-wave lithotripsy.Urol Res. 1990;18 Suppl 1:S13-23. doi: 10.1007/BF00301523. Urol Res. 1990. PMID: 2291245 Review. No abstract available.
-
Shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteric stones: supine or prone.Urol Res. 2011 Jun;39(3):177-80. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0322-1. Epub 2010 Oct 21. Urol Res. 2011. PMID: 20963407
-
ESWL in situ or ureteroscopy for ureteric stones?World J Urol. 1993;11(1):54-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00182172. World J Urol. 1993. PMID: 8490668
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources