Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Dec;10(2):021104.
doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.021104.

What is the evidence for transmission of COVID-19 by children in schools? A living systematic review

Wei Xu  1 , Xue Li  1   2 , Marshall Dozier  3 , Yazhou He  1 , Amir Kirolos  1   4 , Zhongyu Lang  1 , Catherine Mathews  5 , Nandi Siegfried  5 , Evropi Theodoratou  1   6 ; UNCOVER
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

What is the evidence for transmission of COVID-19 by children in schools? A living systematic review

Wei Xu et al. J Glob Health. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background: It is of paramount importance to understand the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in schools, which could support the decision-making about educational facilities closure or re-opening with effective prevention and control measures in place.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the extent of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in schools. We performed risk of bias evaluation of all included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

Results: 2178 articles were retrieved and 11 studies were included. Five cohort studies reported a combined 22 student and 21 staff index cases that exposed 3345 contacts with 18 transmissions (overall infection attack rate (IAR): 0.08%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.00%-0.86%). IARs for students and school staff were 0.15% (95% CI = 0.00%-0.93%) and 0.70% (95% CI = 0.00%-3.56%) respectively. Six cross-sectional studies reported 639 SARS-CoV-2 positive cases in 6682 study participants tested [overall SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate: 8.00% (95% CI = 2.17%-16.95%). SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate was estimated to be 8.74% (95% CI = 2.34%-18.53%) among students, compared to 13.68% (95% CI = 1.68%-33.89%) among school staff. Gender differences were not found for secondary infection (OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 0.50-4.14, P = 0.49) and SARS-CoV-2 positivity (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.72-1.13, P = 0.36) in schools. Fever, cough, dyspnea, ageusia, anosmia, rhinitis, sore throat, headache, myalgia, asthenia, and diarrhoea were all associated with the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (based on two studies). Overall, study quality was judged to be poor with risk of performance and attrition bias, limiting the confidence in the results.

Conclusions: There is limited high-quality evidence available to quantify the extent of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in schools or to compare it to community transmission. Emerging evidence suggests lower IAR and SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate in students compared to school staff. Future prospective and adequately controlled cohort studies are necessary to confirm this finding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors completed the ICMJE Unified Competing Interest form (available upon request from the corresponding author), and declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart summarizing study identification and selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overall infection attack rate. Panel A. Forest plot. Panel B. Funnel plot. Panel C. Egger’s plot.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Student infection attack rate. Panel A. Forest plot. Panel B. Funnel plot. Panel C. Egger’s plot.
Figure 4
Figure 4
School staff infection attack rate. Panel A. Forest plot. Panel B. Funnel plot. Panel C. Egger’s plot.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Overall SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate. Panel A. Forest plot. Panel B. Funnel plot. Panel C. Egger’s plot.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Student SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate. Panel A. Forest plot. Panel B. Funnel plot. Panel C. Egger’s plot.
Figure 7
Figure 7
School staff SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate. Panel A. Forest plot. Panel B. Funnel plot. Panel C. Egger’s plot.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available: https://covid19.who.int/. Accessed: 17 September 2020.
    1. Viner RM, Russell SJ, Croker H, Packer J, Ward J, Stansfield C, et al. School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: a rapid systematic review. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4:397-404. 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30095-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li X, Xu W, Dozier M, He Y, Kirolos A, Theodoratou E.The role of children in transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A rapid review. J Glob Health. 2020;10:011101. 10.7189/jogh.10.011101 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ludvigsson JF.Systematic review of COVID-19 in children shows milder cases and a better prognosis than adults. Acta Paediatr. 2020;109:1088-95. 10.1111/apa.15270 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li X, Xu W, Dozier M, He Y, Kirolos A, Theodoratou E.The role of children in the transmission of SARS-CoV2: updated rapid review. J Glob Health. 2020;10:021101 10.7189/jogh.10.011101 - DOI - PMC - PubMed