Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;14(2):41.
doi: 10.3892/mco.2020.2205. Epub 2020 Dec 30.

Relationship between cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and human papilloma virus infection and gene mutations

Affiliations

Relationship between cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and human papilloma virus infection and gene mutations

Masaru Fukahori et al. Mol Clin Oncol. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC) is rare, accounting for 5% of all esophageal carcinomas. Several diagnostic and predictive markers have been studied. However, to the best of our knowledge, no biomarker is known to determine patient management except the clinical stage. The present study aimed to evaluate whether human papilloma virus (HPV) infection, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its pathway-related gene mutations, known to be sensitive biomarkers of oropharyngeal carcinomas, could be used as biomarkers for the prediction of the prognosis of patients with CESCC. The present retrospective study included patients with CESCC who received chemoradiotherapy or surgery. HPV infection and the genomic status of EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, NRAS and PIK3CA of each tumor sample from patients with CESCC were analyzed by in situ hybridizations (ISH) and PCR methods, respectively. The present study included 33 patients with CESCC (male/female, 29/4; median age, 62 years; age range, 41-86 years; clinical stage I/II/III/IV, 2/6/10/15). The present study detected HPV in one patient (3.0%) by ISH and PCR. Concerning the investigation of EGFR and its pathway-related gene mutations, the present study detected 15.1% of EGFR, 6.0% of NRAS, 3.5% of BRAF, 3.0% of KRAS and 3.0% for PIK3CA mutations, with no significant relationship between any gene mutations and the clinical prognostic factors. The HPV-infected patient did not exhibit any gene mutations. The present study indicated that HPV infection, EGFR and its pathway-related gene mutations rarely exist in patients with CESCC. The relationship between these biomarkers and the prognosis in patients with CESCC is still unclear.

Keywords: 5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit α; MAPK pathway and phosphatidylinositol-4; epidermal growth factor receptor; esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; gene mutations; human papilloma virus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ventana inform human papilloma virus probe. NBT/BCIP, nitrotetrazolium blue chloride/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate p-toluidine salt; AP, alkaline phosphatase.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grass GD, Cooper SL, Armeson K, Garrett-Mayer E, Sharma A. Cervical esophageal cancer: A population-based study. Head Neck. 2015;37:808–814. doi: 10.1002/hed.23678. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mendenhall WM, Sombeck MD, Parsons JT, Kasper ME, Stringer SP, Vogel SB. Management of cervical esophageal carcinoma. Semin Radiat Oncol. 1994;4:179–191. doi: 10.1053/SRAO00400179. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ajani JA, D'Amico TA, Almhanna K, Bentrem DJ, Besh S, Chao J, Das P, Denlinger C, Fanta P, Fuchs CS, et al. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 1.2015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015;13:194–227. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lordick F, Mariette C, Haustermans K, Obermannová R, Arnold D. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27 (Suppl 5):v50–v57. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw329. ESMO Guidelines Committee. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li G, Sturgis EM. The role of human papillomavirus in squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Curr Oncol Rep. 2006;8:130–139. doi: 10.1007/s11912-006-0048-y. - DOI - PubMed