Efficacy of cell proliferation imaging with 4DST PET/CT for predicting the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer: a comparison study with FDG PET/CT
- PMID: 33438100
- DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05179-x
Efficacy of cell proliferation imaging with 4DST PET/CT for predicting the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer: a comparison study with FDG PET/CT
Abstract
Purpose: 4'-[Methyl-11C] thiothymidine (4DST) incorporates into DNA directly and is a PET tracer used for cell proliferation imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prediction of prognosis with pretreatment 4DST PET/CT compared to fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in patients with esophageal cancer.
Methods: In this prospective study, we analyzed 46 patients (68.2 ± 10.0 years old) with pathologically proven esophageal squamous cell cancer who underwent pretreatment 4DST and FDG PET/CT. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and total lesion proliferation (TLP) were measured for FDG and 4DST PET. The study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients' clinical backgrounds, including age, histological type, clinical stage, and surgical treatment, were adjusted using the Cox proportional-hazards model.
Results: In the follow-up period (median 18.8 (interquartile range: 10.1-29.0) months), 26 and 19 patients showed disease progression and cancer-related death, respectively. After adjusting for clinical variables, only the 4DST parameters (SUVmax (p = 0.001) and TLP (p = 0.022)) were statistically significant for predicting PFS. FDG MTV (p = 0.031), 4DST SUVmax (p = 0.022), and TLP (p = 0.023) were statistically significant for predicting OS. Of the PET parameters, 4DST SUVmax yielded the highest adjusted hazard ratio for both PFS (4.88, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.83-12.97) and OS (4.19, 95% CI: 1.23-14.20).
Conclusion: Higher accumulation of 4DST in the primary tumor may lead to shorter OS and PFS. 4DST PET/CT is useful for predicting prognosis and may outperform FDG PET/CT.
Keywords: 4DST; Esophageal cancer; FDG; Overall survival; PET/CT; Prognosis.
Similar articles
-
Influence of volumetric 4'-[methyl-11C]-thiothymidine PET/CT parameters for prediction of the clinical outcome of head and neck cancer patients.Ann Nucl Med. 2017 Jan;31(1):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s12149-016-1131-6. Epub 2016 Sep 27. Ann Nucl Med. 2017. PMID: 27679399 Clinical Trial.
-
Volumetric comparison of positron emission tomography/computed tomography using 4'-[methyl-¹¹C]-thiothymidine with 2-deoxy-2-¹⁸F-fluoro-D-glucose in patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Nucl Med Commun. 2015 Mar;36(3):219-25. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000241. Nucl Med Commun. 2015. PMID: 25369751
-
Prognostic significance of standardized uptake value and metabolic tumour volume on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Aug;42(9):1353-61. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3051-4. Epub 2015 Jun 12. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015. PMID: 26067088
-
Efficacy of 4'-[methyl-11C] thiothymidine PET/CT before and after neoadjuvant therapy for predicting therapeutic responses in patients with esophageal cancer: a pilot study.EJNMMI Res. 2019 Jan 30;9(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13550-019-0478-9. EJNMMI Res. 2019. PMID: 30701347 Free PMC article.
-
Texture analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT to predict tumour response and prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer treated by chemoradiotherapy.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Feb;44(2):206-214. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3506-2. Epub 2016 Sep 10. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017. PMID: 27613542
Cited by
-
The prognostic value of pretreatment [18F]FDG PET/CT parameters in esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun;35(6):3396-3408. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11207-3. Epub 2024 Nov 21. Eur Radiol. 2025. PMID: 39570366
References
-
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. - DOI
-
- Howlader N NA, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, Ruhl J, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2017, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2017/ . Accessed 12 Aug 2020.
-
- van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84. - DOI
-
- Stahl M, Walz MK, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, Meyer HJ, Riera-Knorrenschild J, et al. Phase III comparison of preoperative chemotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:851–6. - DOI
-
- Joseph R, Laks S, Meyers M, McRee AJ. Multidisciplinary approach to the management of esophageal malignancies. World J Surg. 2017;41:1726–33. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical