Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 May;32(4):670-678.
doi: 10.1111/pai.13452. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

Effect of extensively hydrolyzed casein vs. conventional formula on the risk of asthma and allergies: The TRIGR randomized clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of extensively hydrolyzed casein vs. conventional formula on the risk of asthma and allergies: The TRIGR randomized clinical trial

Suvi M Virtanen et al. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2021 May.

Abstract

Background: The role of hydrolyzed infant formulas in the prevention of asthma and allergies remains inconsistent. We tested whether extensively hydrolyzed casein formula compared to conventional cow's milk-based formula prevented asthma, allergic rhinitis, or atopic eczema.

Methods: In the randomized double-blind Trial to Reduce IDDM in Genetically at Risk (TRIGR), comparing extensively hydrolyzed to standard cow's milk-based infant formula during the first 6-8 months of life, we assessed the effect of the intervention on the incidence of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and eczema when the children were 9- to 11-years old. The asthma, allergic rhinitis, and eczema occurrence was assessed using online standardized and validated ISAAC questionnaire. Of the 1106 children who participated in this Ancillary study, 560 had been randomized to the experimental (extensively hydrolyzed casein formula) and 546 to the control arm (cow's milk-based formula).

Results: The risk of persistent asthma, allergic rhinitis, or atopic eczema did not differ by treatment, the hazard ratios (95% CI) being 1.00 (0.66-1.52), 0.95 (0.66-1.38), and 0.89 (0.70-1.15), respectively, in the intention-to-treat analysis. Neither were there any differences in the per-protocol analysis.

Conclusions: Extensively hydrolyzed casein formula did not protect from asthma, rhinitis, or eczema in this population carrying genetic risk for type 1 diabetes.

Keywords: asthma; daycare; eczema; extensively hydrolyzed casein formula; infant feeding; rhinitis; weaning.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Devereux G. The increase in the prevalence of asthma and allergy: Food for thought. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6(11):869-874.
    1. Wegienka G, Zoratti E, Johnson CC. The role of the early-life environment in the development of allergic disease. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2015;35(1):1-17.
    1. Du Toit G, Roberts G, Sayre PH, et al. Randomized trial of peanut consumption in infants at risk for peanut allergy. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(9):803-813.
    1. Perkin MR, Logan K, Tseng A, et al. Randomized trial of introduction of allergenic foods in breast-fed infants. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(18):1733-1743.
    1. Greer FR, Sicherer SH, Burks AW, COMMITTEE ON NUTRITION, SECTION ON ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY. The effects of early nutritional interventions on the development of atopic disease in infants and children: The role of maternal dietary restriction, breastfeeding, hydrolyzed formulas, and timing of introduction of allergenic complementary foods. Pediatrics. 2019;143(4):1-11.

Publication types