Fetal neurosonography detects differences in cortical development and corpus callosum in late-onset small fetuses
- PMID: 33438307
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.23592
Fetal neurosonography detects differences in cortical development and corpus callosum in late-onset small fetuses
Abstract
Objective: To explore whether neurosonography can detect differences in cortical development and corpus callosal length in late-onset small fetuses subclassified into small-for-gestational age (SGA) or growth restricted (FGR).
Methods: This was a prospective cohort study in singleton pregnancies, including normally grown fetuses (birth weight between the 10th and 90th centiles) and late-onset small fetuses (estimated fetal weight < 10th centile, diagnosed after 32 weeks of gestation and confirmed by birth weight < 10th centile). Small fetuses were subclassified into SGA (birth weight between the 3rd and 9th centiles and normal fetoplacental Doppler) and FGR (birth weight < 3rd centile and/or abnormal cerebroplacental ratio and/or abnormal uterine artery Doppler). Neurosonography was performed at 33 ± 1 weeks of gestation to assess the depth of the insula, Sylvian fissure and parieto-occipital sulcus in the axial views and corpus callosal length in the midsagittal plane. Measurements were performed offline using Alma Workstation software and were adjusted by biparietal diameter or cephalic index. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the association between the neurosonographic variables and study group, adjusting for confounding factors such as gender, gestational age at neurosonography, nulliparity and pre-eclampsia.
Results: In total, 318 fetuses were included, of which 97 were normally grown and 221 were late-onset small fetuses that were further subdivided into late-onset SGA (n = 67) or late-onset FGR (n = 154). Compared to controls, both SGA and FGR cases showed significantly increased insular depth adjusted for biparietal diameter (median (interquartile range), controls 0.329 (0.312-0.342) vs SGA 0.339 (0.321-0.347) vs FGR 0.336 (0.325-0.349); P = 0.006). A linear tendency to reduced Sylvian fissure depth adjusted for biparietal diameter was also observed across the study groups (mean ± SD, controls 0.148 ± 0.021 vs SGA 0.142 ± 0.025 vs FGR 0.139 ± 0.022; P = 0.003). However, differences were significant only between the FGR and control groups. Corpus callosal length adjusted for cephalic index was significantly reduced in FGR cases compared with both controls and SGA cases, while there was no difference between SGA cases and controls (median (interquartile range), controls 0.500 (0.478-0.531) vs SGA 0.502 (0.487-0.526) vs FGR 0.475 (0.447-0.508); P = 0.005). No differences were found in parieto-occipital sulcus depth between the three study groups.
Conclusion: Neurosonography seems to be a sensitive tool to detect subtle structural differences in brain development in late-onset small fetuses. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Keywords: brain; cortical development; fetal growth restriction; magnetic resonance imaging; neurosonography; small-for-gestational age.
© 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Comment in
-
Reply.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb;59(2):276. doi: 10.1002/uog.24841. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35104925 No abstract available.
-
Should we expand indications for targeted fetal neurosonography?Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb;59(2):274-276. doi: 10.1002/uog.24840. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35104926 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Lee AC, Katz J, Blencowe H, Cousens S, Kozuki N, Vogel JP, Adair L, Baqui AH, Bhutta ZA, Caulfield LE, Christian P, Clarke SE, Ezzati M, Fawzi W, Gonzalez R, Huybregts L, Kariuki S, Kolsteren P, Lusingu J, Marchant T, Merialdi M, Mongkolchati A, Mullany LC, Ndirangu J, Newell ML, Nien JK, Osrin D, Roberfroid D, Rosen HE, Sania A, Silveira MF, Tielsch J, Vaidya A, Willey BA, Lawn JE, Black RE, CHERG SGA-Preterm Birth Working Group. National and regional estimates of term and preterm babies born small for gestational age in 138 low-income and middle-income countries in 2010. Lancet Glob Heal 2013; 1: e26-36.
-
- Breeze AC, Lees CC. Prediction and perinatal outcomes of fetal growth restriction. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2007; 12: 383-397.
-
- Demicheva E, Crispi F. Long-term follow-up of intrauterine growth restriction: cardiovascular disorders. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014; 36: 143-153.
-
- Baschat AA. Neurodevelopment after fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014; 36: 136-142.
-
- Figueras F, Gratacós E. Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014; 36: 86-98.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
