Bayesian group sequential enrichment designs based on adaptive regression of response and survival time on baseline biomarkers
- PMID: 33438761
- PMCID: PMC9178782
- DOI: 10.1111/biom.13421
Bayesian group sequential enrichment designs based on adaptive regression of response and survival time on baseline biomarkers
Abstract
Precision medicine relies on the idea that, for a particular targeted agent, only a subpopulation of patients is sensitive to it and thus may benefit from it therapeutically. In practice, it is often assumed based on preclinical data that a treatment-sensitive subpopulation is known, and moreover that the agent is substantively efficacious in that subpopulation. Due to important differences between preclinical settings and human biology, however, data from patients treated with a new targeted agent often show that one or both of these assumptions are false. This paper provides a Bayesian randomized group sequential enrichment design that compares an experimental treatment to a control based on survival time and uses early response as an ancillary outcome to assist with adaptive variable selection and enrichment. Initially, the design enrolls patients under broad eligibility criteria. At each interim decision, submodels for regression of response and survival time on a baseline covariate vector and treatment are fit; variable selection is used to identify a covariate subvector that characterizes treatment-sensitive patients and determines a personalized benefit index, and comparative superiority and futility decisions are made. Enrollment of each cohort is restricted to the most recent adaptively identified treatment-sensitive patients. Group sequential decision cutoffs are calibrated to control overall type I error and account for the adaptive enrollment restriction. The design provides a basis for precision medicine by identifying a treatment-sensitive subpopulation, if it exists, and determining whether the experimental treatment is superior to the control in that subpopulation. A simulation study shows that the proposed design reliably identifies a sensitive subpopulation, yields much higher generalized power compared to several existing enrichment designs and a conventional all-comers group sequential design, and is robust.
Keywords: adaptive enrichment design; clinical trial; joint variable selection; piecewise exponential distribution.
© 2021 The International Biometric Society.
Similar articles
-
A randomized group sequential enrichment design for immunotherapy and targeted therapy.Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 May;116:106742. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106742. Epub 2022 Apr 8. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022. PMID: 35405335
-
Bayesian adaptive patient enrollment restriction to identify a sensitive subpopulation using a continuous biomarker in a randomized phase 2 trial.Pharm Stat. 2016 Sep;15(5):420-9. doi: 10.1002/pst.1761. Epub 2016 Aug 3. Pharm Stat. 2016. PMID: 27485377
-
An adaptive enrichment design using Bayesian model averaging for selection and threshold-identification of predictive variables.Biometrics. 2024 Oct 3;80(4):ujae141. doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae141. Biometrics. 2024. PMID: 39656745
-
New Methods and Software for Designing Adaptive Clinical Trials of New Medical Treatments [Internet].Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2019 Oct. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2019 Oct. PMID: 39102492 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
The Bayesian Design of Adaptive Clinical Trials.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 10;18(2):530. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020530. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33435249 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Personalized Risk-Based Screening Design for Comparative Two-Arm Group Sequential Clinical Trials.J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 12;12(3):448. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030448. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 35330448 Free PMC article.
-
Biomarker-guided adaptive enrichment design with threshold detection for clinical trials with time-to-event outcome.J Biopharm Stat. 2025 Apr 20:1-18. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2025.2489291. Online ahead of print. J Biopharm Stat. 2025. PMID: 40253620
-
Enrichment Bayesian design for randomized clinical trials using categorical biomarkers and a binary outcome.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Feb 27;22(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01513-z. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022. PMID: 35220954 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges and opportunities in biomarker-driven trials: adaptive randomization.Ann Transl Med. 2022 Sep;10(18):1035. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-6027. Ann Transl Med. 2022. PMID: 36267794 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Causal Framework for Making Individualized Treatment Decisions in Oncology.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 14;14(16):3923. doi: 10.3390/cancers14163923. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36010916 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Albert JH and Chib S (1993) Bayesian analysis of binary and poly-chotomous response data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 669–679.
-
- Brannath W, Zuber E, Branson M, Bretz F, Gallo P, Posch M and Racine-Poon A (2009) Confirmatory adaptive designs with Bayesian decision tools for a targeted therapy in oncology. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 1445–1463. - PubMed
-
- FDA (2012) Draft guidance for industry: Enrichment strategies for clinical trials to support approval of human drugs and biological products. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents... (Accessed December 17, 2012).
-
- Freidlin B, Jiang W and Simon R (2010) The cross-validated adaptive signature design. Clinical Cancer Research, 16, 691–698. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources