Insurance Acceptance, Appointment Wait Time, and Dermatologist Access Across Practice Types in the US
- PMID: 33439219
- PMCID: PMC7807384
- DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.5173
Insurance Acceptance, Appointment Wait Time, and Dermatologist Access Across Practice Types in the US
Abstract
Importance: In the 15 years since dermatology access was last investigated on a national scale, the practice landscape has changed with the rise of private equity (PE) investment and increased use of nonphysician clinicians (NPCs).
Objective: To determine appointment success and wait times for patients with various insurance types at clinics with and without PE ownership.
Design, setting, and participants: In this study, PE-owned US clinics were randomly selected and matched with 2 geographically proximate clinics without PE ownership. Researchers called each clinic 3 times over a 5-day period to assess appointment/clinician availability for a fictitious patient with a new and changing mole. The 3 calls differed by insurance type specified, which were Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) preferred provider organization, Medicare, or Medicaid.
Main outcomes and measures: Appointment success and wait times among insurance types and between PE-owned clinics and control clinics. Secondary outcomes were the provision of accurate referrals to other clinics when appointments were denied and clinician and next-day appointment availability.
Results: A total of 1833 calls were made to 204 PE-owned and 407 control clinics without PE ownership across 28 states. Overall appointment success rates for BCBS, Medicare, and Medicaid were 96%, 94%, and 17%, respectively. Acceptance of BCBS (98.5%; 95% CI, 96%-99%; P = .03) and Medicare (97.5%; 95% CI, 94%-99%; P = .02) were slightly higher at PE-owned clinics (compared with 94.6% [95% CI, 92%-96%] and 92.8% [95% CI, 90%-95%], respectively, at control clinics). Wait times (median days, interquartile range [IQR]) were similar for patients with BCBS (7 days; IQR, 2-22 days) and Medicare (7 days; IQR, 2-25 days; P > .99), whereas Medicaid patients waited significantly longer (13 days; IQR, 4-33 days; P = .002). Clinic ownership did not significantly affect wait times. Private equity-owned clinics were more likely than controls to offer a new patient appointment with an NPC (80% vs 63%; P = .001) and to not have an opening with a dermatologist (16% vs 6%; P < .001). Next-day appointment availability was greater at PE-owned clinics than controls (30% vs 21%; P = .001).
Conclusions and relevance: Patients with Medicaid had significantly lower success in obtaining appointments and significantly longer wait times regardless of clinic ownership. Although the use of dermatologists and NPCs was similar regardless of clinic ownership, PE-owned clinics were more likely than controls to offer new patient appointments with NPCs.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Comparison of Access to Eye Care Appointments Between Patients With Medicaid and Those With Private Health Care Insurance.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun 1;136(6):622-629. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0813. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29710290 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Private Equity Ownership on Access to Outpatient Urologic Cancer Care in Medicare Recipients.Urology. 2024 Nov;193:99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.08.014. Epub 2024 Aug 15. Urology. 2024. PMID: 39153603
-
Access to Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Care at Private Equity-Owned Otolaryngology Clinics.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jun;170(6):1705-1711. doi: 10.1002/ohn.665. Epub 2024 Feb 8. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 38327257
-
Medicaid Patients Have Greater Difficulty Scheduling Health Care Appointments Compared With Private Insurance Patients: A Meta-Analysis.Inquiry. 2019 Jan-Dec;56:46958019838118. doi: 10.1177/0046958019838118. Inquiry. 2019. PMID: 30947608 Free PMC article.
-
The challenge of long waiting lists: how we implemented a GP referral system for non-urgent specialist' appointments at an Australian public hospital.BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Nov 4;10:303. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-303. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010. PMID: 21050488 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Disparities in access for melanoma screening by region, specialty, and insurance: A cross-sectional audit study.JAAD Int. 2022 Mar 29;7:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2022.02.008. eCollection 2022 Jun. JAAD Int. 2022. PMID: 35373156 Free PMC article.
-
Dermatology in Student-Run Clinics in the United States: Scoping Review.JMIR Dermatol. 2024 Dec 13;7:e59368. doi: 10.2196/59368. JMIR Dermatol. 2024. PMID: 39671559 Free PMC article.
-
The United States dermatology inpatient workforce between 2013 and 2019: a Medicare analysis reveals contraction of the workforce and vast access deserts-a cross-sectional analysis.Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Mar 14;316(4):103. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-02845-0. Arch Dermatol Res. 2024. PMID: 38485858 Free PMC article.
-
HPV Vaccination Knowledge and Decision-Making Among Adults 27 to 45 Years: A Large Online Survey.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Jun 25;10(3):e70182. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70182. eCollection 2025 Jun. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025. PMID: 40575452 Free PMC article.
-
Qualitative perspectives of Medicaid-insured patients on ambulatory care at an academic medical center: challenges and opportunities.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1139. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11619-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39334375 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical