Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jul;32(7):1633-1652.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04636-3. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

Prevalence, incidence and bothersomeness of urinary incontinence in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Heidi F A Moossdorff-Steinhauser  1 , Bary C M Berghmans  2 , Marc E A Spaanderman  3 , Esther M J Bols  4
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prevalence, incidence and bothersomeness of urinary incontinence in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Heidi F A Moossdorff-Steinhauser et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common and embarrassing complaint for pregnant women. Reported prevalence and incidence figures show a large range, due to varying case definitions, recruited population and study methodology. Precise prevalence and incidence figures on (bothersome) UI are of relevance for health care providers, policy makers and researchers. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the prevalence and incidence of UI in pregnancy in the general population for relevant subgroups and assessed experienced bother.

Methods: All observational studies published between January 1998 and October 2018 reporting on prevalence and/or incidence of UI during pregnancy were included. All women, regardless of weeks of gestation and type of UI presented in all settings, were of interest. A random-effects model was used. Subgroup analyses were conducted by parity, trimester and subtype of UI.

Results: The mean (weighted) prevalence based on 44 included studies, containing a total of 88.305 women, was 41.0% (range of 9-75%). Stress urinary incontinence (63%) is the most prevalent type of UI; 26% of the women reported daily loss, whereas 40% reported loss on a monthly basis. Bother was experienced as mild to moderate.

Conclusions: UI is very prevalent and rising with the weeks of gestation in pregnancy. SUI is the most common type and in most cases it was a small amount. Bother for UI is heterogeneously assessed and experienced as mild to moderate by pregnant women.

Keywords: Bother; Incidence; Pregnancy; Prevalence; Systematic review; Urinary incontinence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pooled prevalence of UI during pregnancy
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 21 (1):5–26. 10.1007/s00192-009-0976-9 - PubMed
    1. Morkved S, Bo K, Schei B, Salvesen KA. Pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy to prevent urinary incontinence: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(2):313–319. - PubMed
    1. Abrams A, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A, editors. Incontinence 6th edition. Bristol, UK: ICI-ICS. International Continence Society; 2017.
    1. Stafne SN, Salvesen K, Romundstad PR, Torjusen IH, Mørkved S. Does regular exercise including pelvic floor muscle training prevent urinary and anal incontinence during pregnancy? A randomised controlled trial. Bjog. 2012;119(10):1270–1280. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03426.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Botlero R, Davis SR, Urquhart DM, Shortreed S, Bell RJ. Age-specific prevalence of, and factors associated with, different types of urinary incontinence in community-dwelling Australian women assessed with a validated questionnaire. Maturitas. 2009;62(2):134–139. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.12.017. - DOI - PubMed