A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation
- PMID: 33441135
- PMCID: PMC7804576
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06056-5
A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation
Abstract
Background: Up to 50% of medicines are not used as intended, resulting in poor health and economic outcomes. Medicines optimisation is 'a person-centred approach to safe and effective medicines use, to ensure people obtain the best possible outcomes from their medicines'. The purpose of this exercise was to co-produce a prioritised research agenda for medicines optimisation using a multi-stakeholder (patient, researcher, public and health professionals) approach.
Methods: A three-stage, multiple method process was used including: generation of preliminary research questions (Stage 1) using a modified Nominal Group Technique; electronic consultation and ranking with a wider multi-stakeholder group (Stage 2); a face-to-face, one-day consensus meeting involving representatives from all stakeholder groups (Stage 3).
Results: In total, 92 research questions were identified during Stages 1 and 2 and ranked in order of priority during stage 3. Questions were categorised into four areas: 'Patient Concerns' [e.g. is there a shared decision (with patients) about using each medicine?], 'Polypharmacy' [e.g. how to design health services to cope with the challenge of multiple medicines use?], 'Non-Medical Prescribing' [e.g. how can the contribution of non-medical prescribers be optimised in primary care?], and 'Deprescribing' [e.g. what support is needed by prescribers to deprescribe?]. A significant number of the 92 questions were generated by Patient and Public Involvement representatives, which demonstrates the importance of including this stakeholder group when identifying research priorities.
Conclusions: A wide range of research questions was generated reflecting concerns which affect patients, practitioners, the health service, as well the ethical and philosophical aspects of the prescribing and deprescribing of medicines. These questions should be used to set future research agendas and funding commissions.
Keywords: Deprescribing; Medicines optimisation; Nominal group technique; Non-medical prescribing; Patient concerns; Polypharmacy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Person-centred medicines optimisation policy in England: an agenda for research on polypharmacy.Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Jan;18(1):24-34. doi: 10.1017/S1463423616000207. Epub 2016 Jun 16. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017. PMID: 27306579 Review.
-
What makes a multidisciplinary medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people work well in primary care? A realist review and synthesis.BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 25;23(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04256-8. BMC Geriatr. 2023. PMID: 37743469 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Optimising a person-centred approach to stopping medicines in older people with multimorbidity and polypharmacy using the DExTruS framework: a realist review.BMC Med. 2022 Aug 31;20(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02475-1. BMC Med. 2022. PMID: 36042454 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What factors are important for deprescribing in Australian long-term care facilities? Perspectives of residents and health professionals.BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 10;6(3):e009781. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009781. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 26966056 Free PMC article.
-
What do older adults with multimorbidity and polypharmacy think about deprescribing? The LESS study - a primary care-based survey.BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 31;20(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01843-x. BMC Geriatr. 2020. PMID: 33129274 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Identifying and prioritizing research to inform a research agenda for Canadian chiropractors working in sport - the Canadian sports chiropractic perspective.J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2022 Dec;66(3):227-243. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2022. PMID: 36818363 Free PMC article.
-
Consumer Involvement in the Design and Development of Medication Safety Interventions or Services in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70092. doi: 10.1111/hex.70092. Health Expect. 2024. PMID: 39552111 Free PMC article.
-
Brain injury, mental health and substance use in homeless populations: community-generated recommendations for healthcare service delivery and research.BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 17;25(1):715. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12835-1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025. PMID: 40382615 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring medication self-management in polypharmacy: a qualitative systematic review of patients and healthcare providers perspectives.Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 13;15:1426777. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1426777. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 39376612 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of a multicomponent communication training to involve older people in decisions to DEPRESCRIBE cardiometabolic medication in primary care (CO-DEPRESCRIBE): protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial with embedded process and economic evaluation.BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jun 11;25(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02465-7. BMC Prim Care. 2024. PMID: 38862899 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bigdeli M, Peters D, Wagner A. Medicines in health systems: advancing access, affordability and appropriate use. 2014.
-
- Duerden M, Avery T, Payne R. Polypharmacy and medicines optimisation. Making it safe and sound. London: The King’s Fund; 2013.
-
- WHO . Medication without harm - global patient safety challenge on medication safety. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2017.
-
- Medicines optimisation: the safe and effective use of medicines to enable the best possible outcomes. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK305021/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK305021.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2019. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources