Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):e040544.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040544.

Singing for people with aphasia (SPA): results of a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial of a group singing intervention investigating acceptability and feasibility

Mark Tarrant  1 , Mary Carter  2 , Sarah Gerard Dean  2 , Rod Taylor  3 , Fiona C Warren  2 , Anne Spencer  2 , Jane Adamson  2 , Paolo Landa  4 , Chris Code  5 , Amy Backhouse  2 , Ruth A Lamont  2 , Raff Calitri  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Singing for people with aphasia (SPA): results of a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial of a group singing intervention investigating acceptability and feasibility

Mark Tarrant et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) for the singing groups for people with aphasia (SPA) intervention to assess: (1) the acceptability and feasibility of participant recruitment, randomisation and allocation concealment; (2) retention rates; (3) variance of continuous outcome measures; (4) outcome measure completion and participant burden; (5) fidelity of intervention delivery; (6) SPA intervention costs; (7) acceptability and feasibility of trial and intervention to participants and others involved.

Design: A two-group, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled external pilot trial with parallel mixed methods process evaluation and economic evaluation.

Setting: Three community-based cohorts in the South-West of England.

Participants: Eligible participants with post-stroke aphasia were randomised 1:1 to SPA or control.

Intervention: The manualised SPA intervention was delivered over 10 weekly singing group sessions, led by a music facilitator and assisted by an individual with post-stroke aphasia. The intervention was developed using the Information-Motivation-Behavioural skills model of behaviour change and targeted psychosocial outcomes. Control and intervention participants all received an aphasia information resource pack.

Outcome measures: Collected at baseline, 3 and 6 months post-randomisation, candidate primary outcomes were measured (well-being, quality of life and social participation) as well as additional clinical outcomes. Feasibility, acceptability and process outcomes included recruitment and retention rates, and measurement burden; and trial experiences were explored in qualitative interviews.

Results: Of 87 individuals screened, 42 participants were recruited and 41 randomised (SPA=20, control=21); 36 participants (SPA=17, control=19) completed 3-month follow-up, 34 (SPA=18, control=16) completed 6-month follow-up. Recruitment and retention (83%) were acceptable for a definitive RCT, and participants did not find the study requirements burdensome. High fidelity of the intervention delivery was shown by high attendance rates and facilitator adherence to the manual, and participants found SPA acceptable. Sample size estimates for a definitive RCT and primary/secondary outcomes were identified.

Conclusions: The SPA pilot RCT fulfilled its objectives, and demonstrated that a definitive RCT of the intervention would be both feasible and acceptable.

Trial registration number: NCT03076736.

Keywords: social medicine; stroke; stroke medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors report the Stroke Association funding for the work under consideration.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials diagram of participant recruitment and retention. SPA, singing groups for people with aphasia.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. The Stroke Association State of the nation stroke: statistics, 2018.
    1. Dalemans RJP, De Witte LP, Beurskens AJHM, et al. . An investigation into the social participation of stroke survivors with aphasia. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:1678–85. 10.3109/09638281003649938 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Northcott S, Moss B, Harrison K, et al. . A systematic review of the impact of stroke on social support and social networks: associated factors and patterns of change. Clin Rehabil 2016;30:811–31. 10.1177/0269215515602136 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cruice M, Worrall L, Hickson L. Quantifying aphasic people’s social lives in the context of non‐aphasic peers. Aphasiology 2006;20:1210–25. 10.1080/02687030600790136 - DOI
    1. Vickers CP. Social networks after the onset of aphasia: the impact of aphasia group attendance. Aphasiology 2010;24:902–13. 10.1080/02687030903438532 - DOI

Publication types

Associated data