Addition of probiotics to antibiotics improves the clinical course of pneumonia in young people without comorbidities: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

This study was aimed at investigating the clinical efficacy of probiotics in pneumonia patients. To this end, we enrolled 80 participants diagnosed with pneumonia at Naval Pohang Hospital, Pohang, Korea, from May 2016 to January 2017. The participants were randomly assigned to the control and probiotic groups depending on whether they received probiotics. All participants clinically improved but 22.6% of the participants complained of abnormal stool habits after pneumonia treatment. In comparison, fever duration was significantly shorter in the probiotic group, and the group exhibited an improved general condition. The probiotic group also showed better stool characteristics according to the Bristol stool scale (P = 0.009). Notably, the serum hs-CRP levels were significantly lower in the probiotic group at 2 weeks of treatment (P = 0.015), and all participants in the probiotic group achieved their levels within the normal range. Flow cytometry was used to analyze T-helper 17 (Th17) cells and regulatory T cells (Tregs). Tregs were promoted and the Th17 cell/Treg ratio was suppressed after 2 weeks of treatment in the probiotic group (P = 0.007 and 0.037, respectively). This study demonstrated that probiotics improved clinical symptoms and normalized inflammatory biomarker levels in patients with pneumonia. Early infection and inflammation recovery may be due to the immunomodulatory effects of probiotics by facilitating the subset of Tregs and suppressing the Th17 cell/Treg ratio.

Figure 1

Flow chart of the study.

Figure 2

Comparison of clinical manifestations depending on the administration of the probiotic. Values are mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus control, and ^##P < 0.01 versus control comparing Δ-values. B, baseline; F1, 1 week after treatment; F2, 2 weeks after treatment.

Figure 3

Flow cytometry analysis of T-cells (n = 4–8). Values are mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 versus control, ^#P < 0.05, and ^##P < 0.01 versus control comparing Δ-values. B, baseline; F1, 1 week after treatment; F2, 2 weeks after treatment.