Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;37(1):16-26.
doi: 10.1007/s12055-020-01048-2. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

MICS CABG: a single-center experience of the first 100 cases

Affiliations

MICS CABG: a single-center experience of the first 100 cases

Nitin Kumar Rajput et al. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To study the learning curve and outcomes of the first 100 cases of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed at our center.

Methods: From January 2017 to November 2019, a total of 100 patients underwent CABG via left anterior thoracotomy approach. We have studied the operative times within the MICS CABG patients to analyze our learning curve. We also studied the postoperative outcomes and compared these with those of patients who underwent sternotomy during the same period.

Results: The mean age was 59.33 ± 9.95 (range 37-82) years. The numbers of males and females were 72 and 28 respectively. The preoperative average ejection fraction (EF) was 51.08 ± 9.75%. All these patients underwent CABG via left thoracotomy approach, after satisfying the exclusion criteria. All patients received left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to left anterior descending (LAD) as a standard graft, with the radial artery and saphenous vein being the next alternative conduits. The average length of the incision was 6.06 ± 0.45 cm. Only 2 cases were done on pump. The average number of grafts per patient was 2.33 ± 0.92. The mean operative time was 132.40 ± 11.56 min. The mean duration of ventilation was 4.79 ± 1.90 h and average intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 2.62 ± 0.84 days. There was one conversion and no mortalities in our study. We had analyzed our operative times and noticed a significant reduction after the first 20 cases, which was our learning curve.

Conclusion: MICS CABG can be performed for multivessel disease with the same comfort as for a single or a double vessel disease, once the learning curve has been achieved. Only significant difference from the sternotomy approach was noted in the longer operative times for MICS CABG during the learning curve, and not thereafter. Significant benefits of MICS over sternotomy were noticed in the immediate postoperative parameters like duration of ventilation, mean drainage, postoperative pain, ICU stay, and hospital stay, with no difference in postoperative adverse events.

Keywords: Learning curve; MICS CABG; Multivessel bypass.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Postoperative image wherein the scar is being measured. On the medial aspect of the chest, midline (dashed line) is marked as well as the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th intercostal spaces (horizontal lines). The epicardial pacing wire and the intercostal drainage tube are also seen
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Intraoperative image showing the usage of Starfish cardiac positioner to lift the apex while the Nuvo Octopus myocardial stabilization device is used to position for grafting the obtuse marginal (OM) artery. b Intraoperative image where SVG was used to graft the OM (white arrow). In this case, the conventional Octopus was utilized and was fixed to the rib spreader
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The graphical representation of number of grafts performed over the period of 3 years. The percentage of the number of grafts on Y axis and the year it was performed on X axis
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
A scatter plot, in serial order of each patient who underwent single and double vessel disease plotted on X axis with the operative time of each patient plotted on the Y axis
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Postoperative CT coronary angiography image showing LIMA-Radial Y anastomosis. LIMA grafted to LAD and radial artery grafted to obtuse marginal artery

Comment in

  • MICS CABG: Preoperative and perioperative evaluation.
    Kaya U, Jalalzai I. Kaya U, et al. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Mar;40(2):268-269. doi: 10.1007/s12055-023-01591-8. Epub 2023 Sep 18. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024. PMID: 38389774 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dieberg G, Smart NA, King N. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2016;223:554–560. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.227. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Langer NB, Argenziano M. Minimally invasive cardiovascular surgery: incisions and approaches. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2016;12:4–9. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-12-1-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rodriguez M, Ruel M. Minimally invasive multivessel coronary surgery and hybrid coronary revascularization : can we routinely achieve less invasive coronary surgery ? Methodist DeBakey Cardiovasc J. 2016;12:14–19. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-12-1-14. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malik V, Jha AK, Kapoor PM. Anesthetic challenges in minimally invasive cardiac surgery : are we moving in a right direction ? Ann Card Anaesth. 2016;19:489–497. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.185539. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Une D, Lapierre H, Sohmer B, Rai V, Ruel M. Can minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting be initiated and practiced safely? A Learning Curve Analysis. Innovations. 2013;8:403–409. doi: 10.1097/imi.0000000000000019. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources