Long-term outcome in mediastinal malignancies: video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open surgery
- PMID: 33442207
- PMCID: PMC7778665
- DOI: 10.1007/s12055-020-01023-x
Long-term outcome in mediastinal malignancies: video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open surgery
Abstract
Purpose: There are not many studies comparing long-term oncological outcomes between video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and open surgery for mediastinal malignancies. This study aimed to compare perioperative and long-term outcomes of these two techniques in the treatment of mediastinal malignancies.
Methods: This is a retrospective study: patients with mediastinal malignancies underwent VATS or open surgery from 2010 to 2013 and were followed until 2019. The primary endpoints were long-term oncological outcomes, including tumor recurrence and mortality. Secondary endpoints were perioperative outcomes (operative duration, blood loss, pain, chest drainage duration, hospital length of stay, and complications).
Results: There were 36 patients in the VATS group and 49 patients in the open group. The median follow-up duration was 90 months. VATS significantly reduced operation time (84.6 versus 124.8 min), blood loss (59.8 versus 235.2 ml), postoperative pain score (4.9 versus 6.7), the duration of chest tube drainage (2.1 versus 3.1 days), and postoperative hospital stay (5.2 versus 8.0 days). The two groups were comparable regarding the recurrence rate (2.4 versus 2.1/100 person-years) and mortality rate (0.8 versus 0.9/100 person-years).
Conclusion: Compared with open surgery, VATS is less traumatic, reduces postoperative chest drainage, and shortens hospital stay with comparable long-term oncological outcomes. We advocate the VATS approach as a favored option for the resection of mediastinal malignancies.
Keywords: Malignancy; Mediastinal tumor; Sternotomy; Thoracotomy; Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
© Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons 2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Clinical results of surgical resection of mediastinal teratoma: efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery.Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):4065-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4721-9. Epub 2015 Dec 22. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26694183
-
Robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for mediastinal lesions.J Thorac Dis. 2023 Jul 31;15(7):3840-3848. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-377. Epub 2023 Jul 10. J Thorac Dis. 2023. PMID: 37559661 Free PMC article.
-
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the surgical treatment of Masaoka stage I thymoma.World J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jul 17;11:157. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-157. World J Surg Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23870330 Free PMC article.
-
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Surg. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0618-1. BMC Surg. 2019. PMID: 31615490 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of robotic versus open and video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approaches for thymectomy.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Mar;8(2):174-193. doi: 10.21037/acs.2019.02.04. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019. PMID: 31032201 Free PMC article. Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources