Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 1;12(4):1179-1189.
doi: 10.7150/jca.52123. eCollection 2021.

Decision-making of adjuvant therapy in pT1N1M0 gastric cancer: Should radiotherapy be added to chemotherapy? A propensity score-matched analysis

Affiliations

Decision-making of adjuvant therapy in pT1N1M0 gastric cancer: Should radiotherapy be added to chemotherapy? A propensity score-matched analysis

Siwei Pan et al. J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Early gastric cancer (EGC) with metastatic lymph nodes (mLNs) has a relatively higher recurrence rate and poorer prognosis than EGC without mLNs. However, the postoperative treatment directions of pT1N1M0 vary from different guidelines. This study attempted to confirm the value of postoperative treatments in pT1N1M0 GC patients. Methods: Overall, 379 patients with pT1N1M0 GC following gastrectomy from 2000 to 2016 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was used to reduce bias. Overall survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to confirm the independent prognostic factors. Results: Before matching, the results of survival analyses indicated that adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) and chemoradiotherapy (ACRT) could significantly prolong the survival time of the cohort (P < 0.05). After PSM analysis, 136 patients remained and ACRT maintained significance in the survival analysis (P = 0.018). Furthermore, patients with well or moderately differentiated GC (HR = 0.226, P =0.018) or intestinal type GC (HR = 0.380, P = 0.040) achieved a significantly superior prognosis with ACRT, compared to patients receiving ACT. Conclusion: The survival benefit of ACRT and ACT for pT1N1M0 GC patients following gastrectomy was confirmed in the SEER cohort. RT added to ACT might be recommended according to Lauren's classification and tumor grade in clinical decision making.

Keywords: adjuvant therapy; early gastric cancer; lymph node metastasis; propensity score-matched analysis; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Case screening process for the current analyses from the SEER database. Abbreviations: SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; RT, radiotherapy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan Meier overall survival curves of pT1N1M0 gastric cancer patients according to different adjuvant therapy types. A. The whole cohort; B. the cohort after PSM analysis. Abbreviations: ART, adjuvant radiotherapy; ACT, adjuvant chemotherapy; ACRT, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan Meier overall survival curves of pT1N1M0 gastric cancer patients whether to add radiotherapy to adjuvant chemotherapy. A. The whole cohort; B. the cohort after PSM analysis. Abbreviations: ACT, adjuvant chemotherapy; ACRT, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Subgroup analyses and forest plot of HRs and 95% CIs for overall survival of the whole cohort receiving ACT and ACRT. Abbreviations: No., number of patients; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; NOS, not otherwise specified; eLNs, examined lymph nodes; pLNs, positive lymph nodes.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Subgroup analyses and forest plot of HRs and 95% CIs for overall survival of the cohort receiving ACT and ACRT after PSM analysis. Abbreviations: No., number of patients; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; NOS, not otherwise specified; eLNs, examined lymph nodes; pLNs, positive lymph nodes.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Subgroup analyses and forest plot of HRs and 95% CIs for overall survival of the T1a and T1b GC cohort receiving ACT and ACRT. Abbreviations: No., number of patients; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

References

    1. Sano T, Coit DG, Kim HH. et al. Proposal of a new stage grouping of gastric cancer for TNM classification: International Gastric Cancer Association staging project. Gastric cancer. 2017;20(2):217–225. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lai JF, Kim S, Kim K. et al. Prediction of recurrence of early gastric cancer after curative resection. Annals of surgical oncology. 2009;16(7):1896–1902. - PubMed
    1. Cao L, Selby LV, Hu X. et al. Risk factors for recurrence in T1-2N0 gastric cancer in the United States and China. Journal of surgical oncology. 2016;113(7):745–749. - PMC - PubMed
    1. HG Y, JY A, MG C. et al. Recurrence after curative resection of early gastric cancer. Annals of surgical oncology. 2010;17(2):448–454. - PubMed
    1. Lo SS, Wu CW, Chen JH. et al. Surgical results of early gastric cancer and proposing a treatment strategy. Annals of surgical oncology. 2007;14(2):340–347. - PubMed