Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 14;25(1):3.
doi: 10.1007/s11916-020-00920-5.

Quantitative Sensory Testing to Predict Postoperative Pain

Matthias Braun  1 , Corina Bello  1 , Thomas Riva  1 , Christian Hönemann  2 , Dietrich Doll  3 , Richard D Urman  4 , Markus M Luedi  5
Affiliations
Review

Quantitative Sensory Testing to Predict Postoperative Pain

Matthias Braun et al. Curr Pain Headache Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: We review the relevance of quantitative sensory testing (QST) in light of acute and chronic postoperative pain and associated challenges.

Recent findings: Predicting the occurrence of acute and chronic postoperative pain with QST can help identify patients at risk and allows proactive preventive management. Generally, central QST testing, such as temporal summation of pain (TSP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM), appear to be the most promising modalities for reliable prediction of postoperative pain by QST. Overall, QST testing has the best predictive value in patients undergoing orthopedic procedures. Current evidence underlines the potential of preoperative QST to predict postoperative pain in patients undergoing elective surgery. Implementing QST in routine preoperative screening can help advancing traditional pain therapy toward personalized perioperative pain medicine.

Keywords: Acute postoperative pain; Persistent postoperative pain; Quantitative sensory testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Botti M, Bucknall T, Manias E. The problem of postoperative pain: issues for future research. Int J Nurs Pract. 2004;10(6):257–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172x.2004.00487.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sangesland A, Støren C, Vaegter HB. Are preoperative experimental pain assessments correlated with clinical pain outcomes after surgery? A systematic review. Scand J Pain. 2017;15:44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.12.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet (London, England) 2006;367(9522):1618–1625. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68700-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poleshuck EL, Green CR. Socioeconomic disadvantage and pain. Pain. 2008;136(3):235–238. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.04.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akça O, Melischek M, Scheck T, Hellwagner K, Arkiliç CF, Kurz A, et al. Postoperative pain and subcutaneous oxygen tension. Lancet (London, England) 1999;354(9172):41–42. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)00874-0. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms