Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;28(3):862-869.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01868-8. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

Looking into the mind's eye: Directed and evaluated imagery vividness modulates imagery-perception congruency effects

Brett A Cochrane  1   2 , Vanessa Ng  3 , Anisha Khosla  3 , Bruce Milliken  3
Affiliations

Looking into the mind's eye: Directed and evaluated imagery vividness modulates imagery-perception congruency effects

Brett A Cochrane et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

While most people have had the experience of seeing a representation in the mind's eye, it is an open question whether we have control over the vividness of these representations. The present study explored this issue by using an imagery-perception interface whereby color imagery was used to prime congruent color targets in visual search. In Experiments 1a and 1b, participants were required to report the vividness of an imagined representation after generating it, and in Experiment 2, participants were directed to create an imagined representation with particular vividness prior to generating it. The analyses revealed that the magnitude of the imagery congruency effect increased with both reported and directed vividness. The findings here strongly support the notion that participants have metacognitive awareness of the mind's eye and willful control over the vividness of its representations.

Keywords: Attention capture; Imagery; Metacognition; Visual search.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Science, 16(8), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010 - DOI
    1. Berkeley, G., Goldschmidt, T., & Stapleford, S. (2016). Berkeley’s principles: Expanded and explained. New York, NY: Routledge.
    1. Chang, S., Lewis, D. E., & Pearson, J. (2013). The functional effects of color perception and color imagery. Journal of Vision, 13(10), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.10.4 - DOI
    1. Cochrane, B. A., & Milliken, B. (2019). Imagined event files: An interplay between imagined and perceived objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 538–544. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01572-2 - DOI
    1. Cochrane, B. A., & Milliken, B. (2020). The representational basis of positive and negative repetition effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000713 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources