Evaluation of Diversity and Inclusion Presence Among US Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residency Program Websites
- PMID: 33443852
- DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001693
Evaluation of Diversity and Inclusion Presence Among US Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residency Program Websites
Abstract
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of diversity and inclusion promotion among US physical medicine and rehabilitation residency program Websites. A list of physical medicine and rehabilitation residency programs was obtained from the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database. The program Website links were obtained from the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database or Google. Two reviewers evaluated the presence of 11 predetermined diversity and inclusion metrics. The presence of individual resident and faculty photos and biographies was also evaluated. Cross-sectional and descriptive analyses were performed. A total of 90 physical medicine and rehabilitation residency program Websites were reviewed. Only 15 (17%) Websites met at least 1 of the 11 predetermined criteria. Nine (10%) Websites mentioned diversity in their program mission statement, whereas 7 (8%) included a separate diversity statement. Eight (9%) Websites had a dedicated diversity page/section. Of Websites that included information on their residents and faculty, 62 (85%) had completed 100% of resident photos and 41 (47%) Websites had completed 100% of faculty photos. A total of 30 (41%) Websites had completed 100% of resident biographies, and 15 (17%) Websites had completed 100% of faculty biographies. Less than 20% of all residency program Websites promoted diversity and inclusion. Residency Websites lack key information that prospective applicants use to evaluate diversity.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial disclosure statements have been obtained, and no conflicts of interest have been reported by the authors or by any individuals in control of the content of this article.
References
-
- Gaeta TJ, Birkhahn RH, Lamont D, et al.: Aspects of residency programs’ Web sites important to student applicants. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12:89–92
-
- National Resident Matching Program, Data Release and Research Committee: Results of the 2018 NRMP Program Director Survey . Washington, DC, Figure 2. National Resident Matching Program, 2018. Available at: https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/NRMP... . Accessed April 13, 2020
-
- National Resident Matching Program, Data Release and Research Committee: Results of the 2019 NRMP Applicant Survey by Preferred Specialty and Applicant Type . Washington, DC, Figure 2. National Resident Matching Program, 2019. Available at: https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Appl... . Accessed April 13, 2020
-
- Dinh JV, Salas E: Prioritization of diversity during the residency match: Trends for a new workforce. J Grad Med Educ 2019;11:319–23
-
- Ku MC, Li YE, Prober C, et al.: Decisions, decisions: How program diversity influences residency program choice. J Am Coll Surg 2011;213:294–305
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
