Response to the Comment on Regarding Manuscript "Liver Resection Versus Local Ablation Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Within Milan Criteria: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis"
- PMID: 33443902
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004737
Response to the Comment on Regarding Manuscript "Liver Resection Versus Local Ablation Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Within Milan Criteria: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis"
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Comment on
-
Liver Resection Versus Local Ablation Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Within the Milan Criteria: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Ann Surg. 2021 Apr 1;273(4):656-666. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004350. Ann Surg. 2021. PMID: 33074898
-
Comment on Regarding Manuscript "Liver Resection Versus Local Ablation Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Within the Milan Criteria: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis".Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e871-e872. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004746. Ann Surg. 2021. PMID: 33443897 No abstract available.
References
-
- Shin SW, Ahn KS, Kim SW, et al. Liver resection versus local ablation therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma within the milan criteria: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2020 Oct 14. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004350. Online ahead of print.
-
- Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, et al. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 2003; 7:iii–x. 1-173.
-
- Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016; 355:i4919.
-
- Sterne JAC, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JPA, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2011; 343:d4002.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
