Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 12;18(2):576.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020576.

Harm Perceptions and Beliefs about Potential Modified Risk Tobacco Products

Jennifer C Morgan  1 , Joseph N Cappella  1
Affiliations

Harm Perceptions and Beliefs about Potential Modified Risk Tobacco Products

Jennifer C Morgan et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Under US law, tobacco products may be authorized to claim lower exposure to chemicals, or lower risk of health harms. We sought to examine the harm perceptions and beliefs about potential modified risk tobacco products (MRTPs). We recruited 864 adult current and former smokers in August 2019. Participants read a paragraph describing the potential for the FDA to authorize MRTPs and a brief description of MRTPs. The most endorsed beliefs for each product were that they contained nicotine and that they were risky. Believing that e-cigarettes can help smokers quit smoking, that they tasted good, and looked cool were associated with greater odds of intending to try e-cigarettes after controlling for demographic and use factors. For snus, the beliefs that the product was not addictive and tasted good were associated with increased odds of intending to try snus. The beliefs that heated tobacco would taste good and would be a good quit aid was associated with increased odds of intentions to try heated tobacco products. Understanding what the public believes about products currently or potentially authorized to be marketed as modified risk tobacco products can inform communication efforts.

Keywords: alternate tobacco products; e-cigarettes; modified risk tobacco products.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Gottlieb S., Zeller M. A Nicotine-Focused Framework for Public Health. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:1111–1114. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1707409. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nutt D.J., Phillips L.D., Balfour D., Curran H.V., Dockrell M., Foulds J., Fagerstrom K., Letlape K., Milton A., Polosa R., et al. Estimating the Harms of Nicotine-Containing Products Using the MCDA Approach. EAR. 2014;20:218–225. doi: 10.1159/000360220. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine . Public Health Consequences of e-Cigarettes. National Academies Press; Washington, DC, USA: 2018. - PubMed
    1. Levy D.T., Mumford E.A., Cummings K.M., Gilpin E.A., Giovino G., Hyland A., Sweanor D., Warner K.E. The relative risks of a low-nitrosamine smokeless tobacco product compared with smoking cigarettes: Estimates of a panel of experts. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2004;13:2035–2042. - PubMed
    1. McNeill A., Brose L.S., Calder R., Bauld L., Robson D. Evidence Review of e-Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Products 2018. Public Health England; London, UK: 2018.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources