Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2021 Jan;49(1):300060520945170.
doi: 10.1177/0300060520945170.

Strategy of pacemaker and electrode replacement for superior vena cava stenosis

Affiliations
Case Reports

Strategy of pacemaker and electrode replacement for superior vena cava stenosis

Zhi-Peng Zheng et al. J Int Med Res. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Cardiac implantable devices are commonly used for superior vena cava stenosis, but there have been few reports of electrode replacement in the stenosed superior vena cava. A 73-year-old man was diagnosed with second-degree type II atrioventricular block and a permanent dual-chamber, rate-modulated pacing pacemaker was implanted 10 years previously. Because of depletion of the pacemaker battery and an increase in the ventricular pacing threshold, replacement of the pacemaker and ventricular electrode was required. During the operation, we found that the patient had severe superior vena cava stenosis on angiography, and this caused obstruction when a common guidewire was used to pass through the superior vena cava. After attempting various methods, we successfully passed through the vascular stenosis with a super slide guidewire and a long sheath, and completed replacement of the pacemaker and ventricular electrode. We summarize the related literature of superior vena cava stenosis related to a cardiac implantable device, and discuss the replacement strategy of this complication and other treatment options.

Keywords: Superior vena cava stenosis; arrhythmia; atrioventricular block; cardiac implantable device; guidewire; pacemaker electrode.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
An electrocardiogram shows that the patient’s heart rate depended on pacemaker pacing.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A chest X-ray shows the position of the pacemaker and electrode.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Angiography shows stenosis at the T3 level of the superior vena cava (arrowhead).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
After the ventricular electrode passed through the SVC stenosis, the long sheath was withdrawn.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Successful replacement of the pacemaker and ventricular electrode.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
The patient’s postoperative electrocardiogram shows a pacing rhythm.

Similar articles

References

    1. Abu-El-Haija B, Bhave PD, Campbell DN, et al. Venous stenosis after transvenous lead placement: a study of outcomes and risk factors in 212 consecutive patients. J Am Heart Assoc 2015; 4: e001878. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang C, Gao Y, Zheng J, et al. A case of cardiac resynchronization treatment of defibrillator by implantation of severe stenosis of superior vena cava. Chinese Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias 2014; 18: 233–234.
    1. Sun G, Shen F. Cardiac resynchronization for multiple occlusion of superior vena cava. Chinese Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias 2013; 17: 467–468.
    1. Xu S, Feng G, Chen Z. Application of long artery sheath in pacemaker installation for patients with superior vena cava stenosis. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice 2011; 15: 60–61.
    1. Vidyasagar R, Sudarshan, Singh RN, et al. Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis and stenosis after implantation of pacemakers and defibrillators; A prospective study. Rom J Intern Med 2017; 55: 139–144. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources