Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov;54(6):466-483.
doi: 10.1177/0022219420982981. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

How Specific Are Learning Disabilities?

Affiliations

How Specific Are Learning Disabilities?

Robin L Peterson et al. J Learn Disabil. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Despite historical emphasis on "specific" learning disabilities (SLDs), academic skills are strongly correlated across the curriculum. Thus, one can ask how specific SLDs truly are. To answer this question, we used bifactor models to identify variance shared across academic domains (academic g), as well as variance unique to reading, mathematics, and writing. Participants were 686 children ages 8 to 16. Although the sample was overselected for learning disabilities, we intentionally included children across the full range of individual differences in this study in response to growing recognition that a dimensional, quantitative view of SLD is more accurate than a categorical view. Confirmatory factor analysis identified five academic domains (basic reading, reading comprehension, basic math, math problem-solving, and written expression); spelling clustered with basic reading and not writing. In the bifactor model, all measures loaded significantly on academic g. Basic reading and mathematics maintained variance distinct from academic g, consistent with the notion of SLDs in these domains. Writing did not maintain specific variance apart from academic g, and evidence for reading comprehension-specific variance was mixed. Academic g was strongly correlated with cognitive g (r = .72) but not identical to it. Implications for SLD diagnosis are discussed.

Keywords: mathematics; reading; writing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Correlated Factors Model – 5 Factors (Model 2 in Table 4).
Note. Model fit: X2(125)=401.08, p<.001, CFI = .96, RMSEA=.057 (90% CI=.051-.063), SRMR=.039, BIC=64800.52, AIC=64510.54, *p < .001 Abbreviations PIAT: Peabody Individual Achievement Test Reading TLWRT: Time Limited Word Recognition Test TOWRE: Test of Word Reading Efficiency GORT-3: Gray Oral Read ing Test—Third Edition WRAT-R: Wide Range Achievement Test—Revised ORI Reading Quest: Qualitative Reading Inventory – Reading Questions WJ-III: Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement—Third Edition WIAT-III: Wechsler Individual Achievement Test – Third Edition TOWL-4: Test of Written Language – Fourth Edition Pass Comp: Passage Comprehension Applied Prob: Applied Problems Comp: Composition
Figure 2
Figure 2. Bifactar Madel (Madel 4 in Table 4)
Note. Model fit: X2(117)=382.22, p<.001, CFI=.96, RMSEA=.057 (90% CI=.051-.064), SRMR = .040, BIC=64833.90, AIC=64507.68, *p < .001 Abbreviations PIAT: Peabody Individual Achievement Test Reading TLWRT: Time Limited Word Recognition Test TOWRE: Test of Word Reading Efficiency GORT-3: Gray Oral Reading Test—Third Edition WRAT-R: Wide Range Achievement Test—Revised QRI Reading Quest: Qualitative Reading Inventory – Reading Questions WJ-III: Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement—Third Edition WIAT-III: Wechsler Individual Achievement Test – Third Edition TOWL-4: Test of Written Language – Fourth Edition Pass Comp: Passage Comprehension Applied Prob: Applied Problems Comp: Composition

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.
    1. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
    1. Berninger V & Abbott D (2010). Listening comprehension, oral expression, reading comprehension and written expression: Related yet unique language systems in grades 1, 3, 5, and 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 635–651. 10.1037/a0019319 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berninger VW, Vaughan K, Abbott RD, Begay K, Coleman KB, Curtin G, … & Graham S (2002). Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 291. 10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.291 - DOI
    1. Bonifay W, Lane S, & Reise S (2017). Three concerns with applying a bifactor model as a structure of psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 5(1), 184–186. 10.1177/2167702616657069 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources