Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2021 Jan 14;57(1):2004367.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.04367-2020. Print 2021 Jan.

Biomarkers in lung cancer screening: the importance of study design

Affiliations
Editorial

Biomarkers in lung cancer screening: the importance of study design

David R Baldwin et al. Eur Respir J. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: D.R. Baldwin reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS, Roche and Johnson and Johnson, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M.E. Callister has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P.A. Crosbie reports personal fees from AstraZeneca and Novartis, personal fees and other from Everest Detection, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: E.L. O'Dowd has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R.C. Rintoul reports personal fees from AstraZeneca and Roche, outside the submitted work; and is Chief Investigator of the LuCiD study, sponsored by Owlstone Medical but declares no financial support or financial interest in Owlstone Medical. Conflict of interest: H.A. Robbins has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R.J.C. Steele has nothing to disclose.

Comment on

References

    1. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 395–409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Koning HJ, van der Aalst CM, de Jong PA et al. Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 503–513. - PubMed
    1. Ten Haaf K, Jeon J, Tammemagi MC et al. Risk prediction models for selection of lung cancer screening candidates: A retrospective validation study. PLoS Med 2017; 14: e1002277. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tammemagi MC, Schmidt H, Martel S et al. Participant selection for lung cancer screening by risk modelling (the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer [PanCan] study): a single-arm, prospective study. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: 1523–1531. - PubMed
    1. Field JK, Duffy SW, Baldwin DR et al. UK Lung Cancer RCT Pilot Screening Trial: baseline findings from the screening arm provide evidence for the potential implementation of lung cancer screening. Thorax 2016; 71: 161–170. - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources