Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec 28:14:1179554920976366.
doi: 10.1177/1179554920976366. eCollection 2020.

Predicting Responses to Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lymphoma: Are We Up to the Standards of Solid Tumors?

Affiliations
Review

Predicting Responses to Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lymphoma: Are We Up to the Standards of Solid Tumors?

Ah-Reum Jeong et al. Clin Med Insights Oncol. .

Abstract

Treatment of cancer has transformed with the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors. However, the majority of solid tumor patients do not respond to checkpoint blockade. In contrast, the response rate to programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is 65% to 84% which is the highest among all cancers. Currently, checkpoint inhibitors are only approved for cHL and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma as the responses to single-agent checkpoint blockade in other hematologic malignancies is disappointingly low. Various established biomarkers such as programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein surface expression, mismatch repair (MMR) status, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) are routinely used in clinical decision-making in solid tumors. In this review, we will explore these biomarkers in the context of hematologic malignancies. We review characteristic 9p24.1 structural alteration in cHL and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) as a basis for response to PD-1 inhibition, as well as the role of antigen presentation pathways. We also explore the reported frequencies of MMR deficiency in various hematologic malignancies and investigate TMB as a predictive marker.

Keywords: 9p24.1; CTLA-4; Lymphoma; MHC; MMR; MSI; PD-1; PD-L1; TMB; biomarker; checkpoint blockade; hematological malignancies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests:The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: A.M.G. receives consulting and speaking fees from Seattle Genetics and consulting fees from EUSA Pharma.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Proposed algorithm for anti-PD-1 inhibitor use in (A) cHL and PMBCL, and (B) in DLBCL and GZL. cHL indicates classical Hodgkin lymphoma; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; dMMR, mismatch repair deficient; GZL, gray zone lymphoma; IHC, immunohistochemistry; MHCII, major histocompatibility complex class II; MSI-H, microsatellite instability high; PD-1, programmed cell death 1; PD-L1, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1; PMBCL, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma; R/R, relapsed/refractory; TMB, tumor mutational burden.

References

    1. Rowshanravan B, Halliday N, Sansom DM. CTLA-4: a moving target in immunotherapy. Blood. 2018;131:58-67. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boussiotis VA. Molecular and biochemical aspects of the PD-1 checkpoint pathway. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1767-1778. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Postow MA, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, et al. Nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2006-2017. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolchok JD, Kluger H, Callahan MK, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:122-133. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Five-year survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1535-1546. - PubMed