Update in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
- PMID: 33447604
- PMCID: PMC7768106
- DOI: 10.1159/000511352
Update in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
Abstract
Background: The aim of modern medicine is to safely classify diseases for successful therapy without invasive measures. Sonography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are potent imaging techniques. However, without contrast medium, the informative value of the 3 native methods is limited. The advantages of sonography are: no radiation exposure or previously known physically harmful interactions with tissue, proportionate disappearance of a contrast agent risk, no (probably irreversible) contrast agent deposits, and no risk of renal insufficiency. But, is that enough to compete with of even exceed CT and MRI?
Summary: In this review, the state of the art of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the abdominal cavity is presented. The remarkable diagnostic possibilities can unfortunately only be demonstrated here in a small number of impressive, typical case studies underpinned by the literature, so that, from one's own perspective, the full spectrum of CEUS can be used by oneself or initiated. Within the limits of physics, the real-time dynamics of CEUS enable conclusions to be drawn, so that with the current technology, sonography, including expansion by contrast, can be considered superior to other imaging methods. It is not uncommon for CEUS to have the value of a control and reference method.
Key messages: Sonography very often enables reliable diagnostics. The introduction of a contrast agent in sonography has led to a quantum leap similar to that of other imaging techniques. Already natively, the real-time representation of dynamic events leads to a certain superiority, i.e., complete observation of the inflow and outflow phases of the contrast medium and the resulting diagnostic; tissue-specific differentiation options provide a unique selling point. Further advantages of the first-choice imaging diagnostic method are: a lack of radiation exposure, repeatability of the examination at any time, local independence, a negligible allergy rate compared to the contrast agents of other methods, and a lack of kidney and thyroid exposure or excluded deposits.
Keywords: Abdomen; Echo contrast sonography; Imaging; Ultrasonography; Ultrasound.
Copyright © 2020 by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Conflict of interest statement
S.B. has no conflict of interest to disclose. J.H.S. declares that he has received lecture fees from Mylan Healthcare GmbH.
Figures
References
-
- Weskott HP. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound. 2nd ed. London: Uni-Med Science; 2013. p. p.240.
-
- Seitz K, Strobel D, Bernatik T, Blank W, Friedrich-Rust M, Herbay A, et al. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterization of focal liver lesions - prospective comparison in clinical practice: CEUS vs. CT (DEGUM multicenter trial). Parts of this manuscript were presented at the Ultrasound Dreiländertreffen 2008, Davos. Ultraschall Med. 2009 Aug;30((4)):383–9. - PubMed
-
- Greis C. Erratum zu: Technische Grundlagen der Kontrastsonographie im Überblick und Ausblick in die Zukunft. Radiologe. 2011;51((8)):679–679. - PubMed
-
- Wermke W, Gaßmann B. Tumour Diagnostics of the Liver with Echo Enhancers. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1998. Scar Tissue Nodules in Closed Liver Injury.
-
- Wermke W. Sonographische Differenzialdiagnose, Leberkrankheiten, Lehrbuch und systematischer Atlas. Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag Köln; 2005.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
