Factors important in bone union after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the cortical bone trajectory technique
- PMID: 33447673
- PMCID: PMC7797788
- DOI: 10.21037/jss-20-608
Factors important in bone union after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the cortical bone trajectory technique
Abstract
Background: The cortical bone trajectory (CBT) technique has developed as an alternative to the traditional pedicle screw fixation technique due to its minimum invasiveness for screw insertion and rigid fixation for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). However, the factors contributing to bone union after CBT-PLIF is a controversial subject. The aim of this study was to investigate factors important to bone union after CBT-PLIF.
Methods: We analyzed 69 consecutive patients who underwent single-level CBT-PLIF from October 2011 to December 2016 and were followed for over two years. Bone union was evaluated using computed tomography (CT) and dynamic assessment in the radiograph within two years after CBT-PLIF. The following factors that may influence bone union were investigated: age, gender, bone mineral density (BMD), cage materials [polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) or titanium (Ti)], vertebral-slip (neutral), translational motion (flexion/extension), angular motion (flexion/extension), screw depth into the vertebral body (% depth), interval of bilateral screw heads, and cage position.
Results: The bone union rate at the two-year follow-up was 88.4% (61/69). A univariate analysis revealed that variables with values of P<0.20 were age (P<0.01), gender (P=0.07), cage material (P=0.18), vertebral slip (neutral) (P=0.14), % depth (P=0.086), and cage position (P<0.01). Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that factors related to bone union were young age (P<0.01), Ti cage (P<0.01), small vertebral slip (neutral) (P<0.01), high % depth (P<0.01), and anterior cage position (P<0.01).
Conclusions: For CBT-PLIF, deeper screw insertion into the vertebral body, anterior cage placement, and Ti cage usage may be important surgical techniques to achieve a successful bone union.
Keywords: Cortical bone trajectory (CBT); bone union; posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).
2020 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jss-20-608). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Surgical outcomes after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional trajectory screw fixation or cortical bone trajectory screw fixation: A comparative study between the polyetheretherketone cage and the same shape titanium-coated polyetheretherketone cage.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Oct;209:106945. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106945. Epub 2021 Sep 17. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021. PMID: 34555798
-
Early Fusion Status After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation or Traditional Trajectory Screw Fixation: A Comparison Between the Titanium-coated Polyetheretherketone Cage and the Same Shape Polyetheretherketone Cage.Clin Spine Surg. 2022 Feb 1;35(1):E47-E52. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001237. Clin Spine Surg. 2022. PMID: 34369910
-
Cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus traditional pedicle screw fixation for 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical outcomes for 2-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jan;28(1):57-62. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE161154. Epub 2017 Nov 10. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018. PMID: 29125430
-
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study.J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Nov;25(5):591-595. doi: 10.3171/2016.3.SPINE151525. Epub 2016 May 27. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016. PMID: 27231813
-
MIS Expandable Interbody Spacers: A Literature Review and Biomechanical Comparison of an Expandable MIS TLIF With Conventional TLIF and ALIF.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41 Suppl 8:S44-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001465. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016. PMID: 26825792 Review.
Cited by
-
Real-world clinical accuracy of long cortical bone trajectory screw placement using a patient-specific template guide.J Spine Surg. 2024 Sep 23;10(3):468-478. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-122. Epub 2024 Aug 17. J Spine Surg. 2024. PMID: 39399092 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior Placement of Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Obtaining Good Lumbar Lordosis Formation.Spine Surg Relat Res. 2023 Sep 4;8(1):51-57. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2023-0133. eCollection 2024 Jan 27. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2023. PMID: 38343413 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and radiological outcomes of titanium cage versus polyetheretherketone cage in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Mar 12;48(1):295. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03453-w. Neurosurg Rev. 2025. PMID: 40075000
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources