Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul 7:6:100040.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100040. eCollection 2020 Sep.

Blood pressure control in older adults with hypertension: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression

Biggie Baffour-Awuah  1 , Gudrun Dieberg  2 , Melissa J Pearson  1 , Neil A Smart  1
Affiliations
Review

Blood pressure control in older adults with hypertension: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression

Biggie Baffour-Awuah et al. Int J Cardiol Hypertens. .

Abstract

Background: Managing blood pressure reduces CVD risk, but optimal treatment thresholds remain unclear as it is a balancing act to avoid hypotension-related adverse events.

Objectives: This systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression evaluated the benefits of intensive BP treatment in hypertensive older adults.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library of Controlled Trials until January 31, 2020. Studies comparing different BP treatments/targets and/or active BP against placebo treatment, with a minimum 12 months follow-up, were included. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% CIs were calculated using a random effects model. The primary outcome was RR of major cardiovascular events (MCEs); secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure (HF), cardiovascular (CV) mortality, and all-cause mortality.

Results: We included 16 studies totaling 65,890 hypertensive participants (average age 69.4 years) with a follow-up period from 1.8 to 4.9 years. Intensive BP treatment significantly reduced the relative risk of MCEs by 26% (RR:0.74, 95%CI 0.64-0.86, p = 0.000; I 2 = 79.71%). RR of MI significantly reduced by 13% (RR:0.87, 95%CI 0.76-1.00, p = 0.052; I 2 = 0.00%), stroke by 28% (RR:0.72, 95%CI 0.64-0.82, p = 0.000; I 2 = 32.45%), HF by 47% (RR:0.53, 95% CI 0.43-0.66, p = 0.000; I 2 = 1.23%), and CV mortality by 24% (RR:0.76, 95%CI 0.66-0.89, p = 0.000; I 2 = 39.74%). All-cause mortality reduced by 17% (RR:0.83, 95%CI 0.73-0.93, p = 0.001; I 2 = 53.09%). Of the participants - 61% reached BP targets and 5% withdrew; with 1 hypotension-related event per 780 people treated.

Conclusions: Lower BP treatment targets are optimal for CV protection, effective, well-tolerated and safe, and support the latest hypertension guidelines.

Keywords: BP, blood pressure; Blood pressure treatment targets; CI, confidence interval; CV, cardiovascular; CVD, cardiovascular disease; Cardiovascular events; HF, heart failure; Hypertension; MCE, major cardiovascular event; Mortality; RR, relative risk or risk ratio.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors declare any conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effect of intensive BP treatment on relative risk of major cardiovascular event and all-cause mortality. A p-value <0.05 represents a significant pooled point of estimate of risk ratio. Short vertical lines across each horizontal lines and horizontal lines represents risk ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each study. The vertical line on the scale 1 interval across all horizontal lines represents the estimate of overall risk ratio. The diamond represents the 95% CI for pooled estimates of effect of risk ratio. Tx represent treatment.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effect of intensive BP treatment on relative risk of cardiovascular outcome events. A p-value <0.05 represents a significant pooled point of estimate of risk ratio. Short vertical lines across each horizontal lines and horizontal lines represents risk ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each study. The vertical line on the scale 1 interval across all horizontal lines represents the estimate of overall risk ratio. The diamond represents the 95% CI for pooled estimates of effect of risk ratio. Tx represent treatment.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. GBD 2017 Causes of death collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1736–1788. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nguyen B., Bauman A., Ding D. Association between lifestyle risk factors and incident hypertension among middle-aged and older Australians. Prev. Med. 2019;118:73–80. - PubMed
    1. Harrap S.B., Lung T., Chalmers J. New blood pressure guidelines pose difficult choices for Australian physicians. Circ. Res. 2019;124(7):975–977. - PubMed
    1. Beckett N.S., Peters R., Fletcher A.E. Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358(18):1887–1898. - PubMed
    1. Hansson L., Zanchetti A., Carruthers S.G. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. Lancet. 1998;351(9118):1755–1762. - PubMed