Sexual misconduct by health professionals in Australia, 2011-2016: a retrospective analysis of notifications to health regulators
- PMID: 33448397
- DOI: 10.5694/mja2.50706
Sexual misconduct by health professionals in Australia, 2011-2016: a retrospective analysis of notifications to health regulators
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the numbers of notifications to health regulators alleging sexual misconduct by registered health practitioners in Australia, by health care profession.
Design, setting: Retrospective cohort study; analysis of Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency and NSW Health Professional Councils Authority data on notifications of sexual misconduct during 2011-2016.
Participants: All registered practitioners in 15 health professions.
Main outcome measures: Notification rates (per 10 000 practitioner-years) and adjusted rate ratios (aRRs) by age, sex, profession, medical specialty, and practice location.
Results: Regulators received 1507 sexual misconduct notifications for 1167 of 724 649 registered health practitioners (0.2%), including 208 practitioners (18%) who were the subjects of more than one report during 2011-2016; 381 notifications (25%) alleged sexual relationships, 1126 (75%) sexual harassment or assault. Notifications regarding sexual relationships were more frequent for psychiatrists (15.2 notifications per 10 000 practitioner-years), psychologists (5.0 per 10 000 practitioner-years), and general practitioners (6.4 per 10 000 practitioner-years); the rate was higher for regional/rural than metropolitan practitioners (aRR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.31-2.30). Notifications of sexual harassment or assault more frequently named male than female practitioners (aRR, 37.1; 95% CI, 26.7-51.5). A larger proportion of notifications of sexual misconduct than of other forms of misconduct led to regulatory sanctions (242 of 709 closed cases [34%] v 5727 of 23 855 [24%]).
Conclusions: While notifications alleging sexual misconduct by health practitioners are rare, such misconduct has serious consequences for patients, practitioners, and the community. Further efforts are needed to prevent sexual misconduct in health care and to ensure thorough investigation of alleged misconduct.
Keywords: Ethics, professional; Medical misconduct; Professional misconduct; Sex offenses; Sexual harassment in medicine.
© 2020 AMPCo Pty Ltd.
References
-
- Medical Board of Australia. Sexual boundaries in the doctor–patient relationship. Dec 2018. https://www.medicalboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Policies/Sexual-boundar... (viewed Feb 2020).
-
- Morton K. Professional sexual misconduct as a breach of trustworthiness: a moral typology of doctors who have engaged in professional sexual misconduct. PhD thesis: University of Melbourne, 2012. https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/handle/11343/37765 (viewed Feb 2020).
-
- Paterson R. Independent review of the use of chaperones to protect patients in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency, 2017. https://nhpopc.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/Chaperone-review-report-WEB.pdf (viewed Feb 2020).
-
- Gartrell NK, Milliken N, Goodson WH, et al. Physician–patient sexual contact. Prevalence and problems. West J Med 1992; 157: 139–143.
-
- Spittal MJ, Studdert DM, Paterson R, Bismark MM. Outcomes of notifications to health practitioner boards: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Med 2016; 14: 198.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical