Effectiveness of CAD/CAM technology: A self-assessment tool for preclinical waxing exercise
- PMID: 33448597
- DOI: 10.1111/eje.12576
Effectiveness of CAD/CAM technology: A self-assessment tool for preclinical waxing exercise
Abstract
Introduction: This study assessed the utility of CAD/CAM technology as a self-assessment tool for preclinical waxing compared to traditional student self-assessment to evaluate preclinical work.
Material and methods: Thirty-seven students completed the wax-up of the maxillary left central incisor with the goal of recreating original anatomy and completed a traditional self-assessment. The original, unreduced cast and waxings were scanned with an intraoral scanner (E4D, Planmeca). Using CAD/CAM software (Compare, Planmeca), each waxing was superimposed over the original. Tolerance (250 µm) was set to illustrate under- and over-contoured areas, enabling visualisation of the waxing compared to original in three dimensions. Students then completed another self-assessment and an exit survey.
Results: Twenty-four per cent of self-assessment responses changed after using Compare Software. 20% changed from satisfactory to unsatisfactory. Four per cent changed from unsatisfactory to satisfactory. Greatest change in response occurred in the Incisal Edge (49%) rubric category. Interproximal Contact Area (3%) demonstrated least change in response. Seventy per cent strongly agreed that Compare Software enabled more effective assessment of Lingual Contour. Eight per cent strongly disagreed that Compare Software enabled more effective assessment of finishing.
Discussion: CAD/CAM software can improve student's critical self-assessment. Different rubric categories demonstrated differing rates of response change, indicating more critical of certain aspects of the waxing. Majority strongly agreed that the software enabled more effective self-assessment.
Conclusion: CAD/CAM technology enhances student's learning in dental wax-up through improving self-assessment. This technology may improve teacher-student communication, reduce one-on-one teaching time and allow higher student-teacher ratio.
Keywords: digital dentistry; education; pre-doctoral; self-assessment; wax-up.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Henzi D, Davis E, Jasinevicius R, Hendricson W. In the students’ own words: what are the strengths and weaknesses of the dental school curriculum? J Dent Educ. 2007;71:632-645.
-
- Fontana M, González-Cabezas C, de Peralta T, Johnsen DC. Dental education required for the changing health care environment. J Dent Educ. 2017;81(8):eS153-eS161.
-
- Perry S, Bridges SM, Burrow MF. A review of the use of simulation in dental education. Simul Healthc. 2015;10:31-37.
-
- Chalmers C, Mowat E, Chapman M. Marking and providing feedback face-to-face: Staff and student perspectives. Act Learn High Educ. 2017;19:35-45.
-
- Ali N, Ahmed L, Rose S. Identifying predictors of students’ perception of and engagement with assessment feedback. Act Learn High Educ. 2017;146978741773560.19:239-251.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous