Performance of four dual-energy CT platforms for abdominal imaging: a task-based image quality assessment based on phantom data
- PMID: 33449188
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07671-2
Performance of four dual-energy CT platforms for abdominal imaging: a task-based image quality assessment based on phantom data
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the spectral performance of dual-energy CT (DECT) platforms using task-based image quality assessment based on phantom data.
Materials and methods: Two CT phantoms were scanned on four DECT platforms: fast kV-switching CT (KVSCT), split filter CT (SFCT), dual-source CT (DSCT), and dual-layer CT (DLCT). Acquisitions on each phantom were performed using classical parameters of abdomen-pelvic examination and a CTDIvol at 10 mGy. Noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were evaluated from 40 to 140 keV of virtual monoenergetic images. A detectability index (d') was computed to model the detection task of two contrast-enhanced lesions as function of keV.
Results: The noise magnitude decreased from 40 to 70 keV for all DECT platforms, and the highest noise magnitude values were found for KVSCT and SFCT and the lowest for DSCT and DLCT. The average NPS spatial frequency shifted towards lower frequencies as the energy level increased for all DECT platforms, smoothing the image texture. TTF values decreased with the increase of keV deteriorating the spatial resolution. For both simulated lesions, higher detectability (d' value) was obtained at 40 keV for DLCT, DSCT, and SFCT but at 70 keV for KVSCT. The detectability of both simulated lesions was highest for DLCT and DSCT.
Conclusion: Highest detectability was found for DLCT for the lowest energy levels. The task-based image quality assessment used for the first time for DECT acquisitions showed the benefit of using low keV for the detection of contrast-enhanced lesions.
Key points: • Detectability of both simulated contrast-enhanced lesions was higher for dual-layer CT for the lowest energy levels. • The image noise increased and the image texture changed for the lowest energy levels. • The detectability of both simulated contrast-enhanced lesions was highest at 40 keV for all dual-energy CT platforms except for fast kV-switching platform.
Keywords: Comparative study; Phantoms, imaging; Radiography, dual-energy scanned projection; Tomography, X-ray computed.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of virtual monoenergetic imaging between a rapid kilovoltage switching dual-energy computed tomography with deep-learning and four dual-energy CTs with iterative reconstruction.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Feb;12(2):1149-1162. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-708. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022. PMID: 35111612 Free PMC article.
-
Phantom task-based image quality assessment of three generations of rapid kV-switching dual-energy CT systems on virtual monoenergetic images.Med Phys. 2022 Apr;49(4):2233-2244. doi: 10.1002/mp.15558. Epub 2022 Mar 7. Med Phys. 2022. PMID: 35184293
-
Dual-energy CT: a phantom comparison of different platforms for abdominal imaging.Eur Radiol. 2018 Jul;28(7):2745-2755. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5238-5. Epub 2018 Feb 5. Eur Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29404773
-
Virtual Non-contrast Imaging in The Abdomen and The Pelvis: An Overview.Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2022 Aug;43(4):293-310. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Mar 18. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2022. PMID: 35738815 Review.
-
Pros and Cons of Dual-Energy CT Systems: "One Does Not Fit All".Tomography. 2023 Jan 27;9(1):195-216. doi: 10.3390/tomography9010017. Tomography. 2023. PMID: 36828369 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Contrast medium dose optimization in the era of multi-energy CT.Jpn J Radiol. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s11604-025-01823-4. Online ahead of print. Jpn J Radiol. 2025. PMID: 40553321 Review.
-
Comparison of image quality of two versions of deep-learning image reconstruction algorithm on a rapid kV-switching CT: a phantom study.Eur Radiol Exp. 2023 Jan 9;7(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41747-022-00314-9. Eur Radiol Exp. 2023. PMID: 36617620 Free PMC article.
-
Virtual monochromatic images of dual-energy CT as an alternative to single-energy CT: performance comparison using a detectability index for different acquisition techniques.Eur Radiol. 2023 Aug;33(8):5752-5760. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09491-6. Epub 2023 Mar 9. Eur Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36892640
-
Impact of four kVp combinations available in a dual-source CT on the spectral performance of abdominal imaging: A task-based image quality assessment on phantom data.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Aug;22(8):243-254. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13369. Epub 2021 Jul 26. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021. PMID: 34312979 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Electron Density Maps and Fused Images in Dual-Energy Cardiac Computed Tomography to Facilitate Detection of Late Iodine Enhancement.Circ Rep. 2025 Apr 11;7(5):341-349. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0115. eCollection 2025 May 9. Circ Rep. 2025. PMID: 40352123 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Agrawal MD, Pinho DF, Kulkarni NM, Hahn PF, Guimaraes AR, Sahani DV (2014) Oncologic applications of dual-energy CT in the abdomen. Radiographics 34:589–612 - DOI
-
- De Cecco CN, Boll DT, Bolus DN et al (2017) White paper of the society of computed body tomography and magnetic resonance on dual-energy CT, part 4: abdominal and pelvic applications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 41:8–14 - DOI
-
- De Cecco CN, Schoepf UJ, Steinbach L et al (2017) White paper of the society of computed body tomography and magnetic resonance on dual-energy CT, part 3: vascular, cardiac, pulmonary, and musculoskeletal applications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 41:1–7 - DOI
-
- Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H et al (2006) First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16:256–268 - DOI
-
- Goo HW, Goo JM (2017) Dual-energy CT: new horizon in medical imaging. Korean J Radiol 18:555–569 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical