Outcomes of Open and Endoscopic Repairs of Chronic Partial- and Full-Thickness Proximal Hamstring Tendon Tears: A Multicenter Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up
- PMID: 33449797
- DOI: 10.1177/0363546520981767
Outcomes of Open and Endoscopic Repairs of Chronic Partial- and Full-Thickness Proximal Hamstring Tendon Tears: A Multicenter Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up
Abstract
Background: The preponderance of literature on the repair of proximal hamstring tendon tears focuses on the acute phase (<4 weeks). As such, there is a paucity of data reporting on the outcomes of chronic proximal hamstring tears.
Purpose: To report minimum 2-year postoperative patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and patient satisfaction from patients who underwent open or endoscopic repair of partial- and full-thickness chronic proximal hamstring tendon tears.
Study design: Case series study; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: Between April 2002 and May 2017, prospectively collected data from 3 tertiary care institutions were retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent open and endoscopic repair of partial- and full-thickness chronic proximal hamstring tendon tears. Patients were included only if they had a chronic proximal hamstring tear (defined as ≥4 weeks from symptom onset to surgery). Patients were excluded if they had a tear treated <4 weeks after injury, underwent hamstring reconstruction, or claimed workers' compensation. Patients who reported minimum 2-year follow-up for VAS, patient satisfaction, and the following PROs had their outcomes analyzed: the modified Hip Harris Score, Non-arthritic Hip Score, iHOT-12 (International Hip Outcome Tool), and Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale.
Results: Fifty patients (34 females and 16 males) were included in this study. There were 19 endoscopic repairs and 31 open repairs. Within the cohort, 52.0% had a full-thickness tendon tear on magnetic resonance imaging, and 48.0% had a partial tear. Average follow-up time was 58.07 ± 37.27 months (mean ± SD; range, 24-220 months). The mean age and body mass index of the group were 46.13 ± 13 years and 25.43 ± 5.14. The average time from injury to surgery was 66.73 weeks (range, 5.14-215.14 weeks). Average postoperative PROs were as follows: modified Hip Harris Score, 91.94 ± 9.96; Non-arthritic Hip Score, 91.33 ± 9.99; iHOT-12, 87.17 ± 17.54; Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale, 87.15 ± 18.10; and VAS, 1.16 ± 1.92. Patient satisfaction was 8.22 ± 1.20.
Conclusion: Patients who underwent open and endoscopic repairs for chronic partial- and full-thickness proximal hamstring tendon tears reported high PROs and satisfaction at a minimum 2-year follow-up with low rates of complications.
Keywords: chronic proximal hamstring tear; endoscopic; open; outcomes; repair.
Similar articles
-
Association Between Proximal Hamstring Tear Characteristics and Achievement of Clinically Significant Outcomes After Endoscopic and Open Repair at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2024 Feb;52(2):390-400. doi: 10.1177/03635465231216118. Epub 2024 Jan 5. Am J Sports Med. 2024. PMID: 38179612
-
Endoscopic Repair of Partial-Thickness Undersurface Tears of the Abductor Tendon: Clinical Outcomes With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.Arthroscopy. 2018 Apr;34(4):1193-1199. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.022. Epub 2018 Jan 2. Arthroscopy. 2018. PMID: 29305287
-
Endoscopic Tendon Compression Bridge Technique for Repair of Partial-Thickness Gluteus Medius Tears With Concomitant Arthroscopy for Labral Tears: Minimum 2-Year Outcomes With Benchmark Control Group.Am J Sports Med. 2023 Dec;51(14):3764-3771. doi: 10.1177/03635465231204314. Epub 2023 Nov 13. Am J Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 37960846
-
Both open and endoscopic gluteal tendon repairs lead to functional improvement with similar failure rates: a systematic review.J ISAKOS. 2021 Jan;6(1):28-34. doi: 10.1136/jisakos-2020-000474. Epub 2020 Sep 24. J ISAKOS. 2021. PMID: 33833043
-
Management of Proximal Hamstring Injuries: Non-operative and Operative Treatment.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2024 Sep;17(9):373-385. doi: 10.1007/s12178-024-09911-0. Epub 2024 Jul 16. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2024. PMID: 39009901 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Surgical treatment of snapping proximal hamstring tendon syndrome: the resolution of snapping and excellent patient satisfaction.J Hip Preserv Surg. 2023 Jun 6;10(3-4):137-142. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnad016. eCollection 2023 Aug-Dec. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2023. PMID: 38162269 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Review of Complications Associated With Proximal Hamstring Tendon Repair.Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Sep 26;11(9):23259671231199092. doi: 10.1177/23259671231199092. eCollection 2023 Sep. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 37781641 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcome after proximal hamstring tendon repair at mean 3 years follow-up.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jan 15;145(1):130. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05684-w. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025. PMID: 39812698 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Outcomes After Open and Endoscopic Repair of Proximal Hamstring Tendon Tears at a Minimum Follow-up of 5 Years.Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Nov 23;11(11):23259671231209054. doi: 10.1177/23259671231209054. eCollection 2023 Nov. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 38021310 Free PMC article.
-
"Scopen" Scope to Open Hamstring Repair.Video J Sports Med. 2022 Jul 7;2(4):26350254221089355. doi: 10.1177/26350254221089355. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug. Video J Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 40309329 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous