Determining the impact of age and sex on the psychophysical and neurophysiological response to thermal pain across the adult lifespan
- PMID: 33450111
- PMCID: PMC7898385
- DOI: 10.1111/jan.14514
Determining the impact of age and sex on the psychophysical and neurophysiological response to thermal pain across the adult lifespan
Abstract
Aims: Determine sex- and age-associated psychophysical and neurophysiological differences in the processing of pain across the adult lifespan.
Design: Preliminary, exploratory, cross-sectional study.
Methods: Using psychophysics (to measure intensity and unpleasantness) and functional magnetic resonance imaging blood oxygenation level dependent methods (to measure stimulus-evoked brain activation), we will examine sex- and age-associated differences in thermal pain processing and their underlying neurophysiology in a broad range of healthy adults (ages 30-89). We will acquire resting state functional connectivity data for secondary analyses exploring whether resting state connectivity predicts psychophysical and neurophysiological responses to thermal pain. To examine the effects of altered blood flow, we will acquire resting-state arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging data to quantify resting cerebral blood flow. We will interpret findings in the context of a proposed neural model of pain, ageing, and sex. Study funding was received in June of 2014. Ethical approval was obtained from the Vanderbilt University IRB prior to study initiation.
Conclusion: Exploring the biological reasons for age- and sex-associated differences in pain processing will increase our understanding of pain in older adults. The paucity of neurobiological evidence to support best practice pain management in older adults places these individuals at risk for poor pain management.
Impact: Poorly treated pain in older adults is a critical public health problem associated with a poor quality of life and increased healthcare costs. Understanding how age and sex have an impact on central processing of pain across the lifespan is a critical step toward improving personalized pain medicine.
目的: 确定成年期疼痛处理中与性别和年龄相关的心理、生理和神经生理学差异。 设计: 初步、探索性、分类排列研究。 方法: 利用心理物理学 (测量强度和不愉快程度) 和功能磁共振成像血氧水平依赖法 (测量刺激诱发的脑激活) , 我们将在广泛的健康成年人 (30-89岁) 中研究与性别和年龄相关的热痛处理差异及其潜在的神经生理学。我们将获得静息状态功能连接数据, 用于二次分析, 以便探索静息状态连接是否能预测热痛的心理、生理和神经生理学反应。为检测血液流动改变的影响, 我们将获取静息状态动脉自旋标记磁共振成像数据, 以量化静息脑血流。我们将按照提出的疼痛、衰老和性别的神经模型解释这些发现。我们已于2014年6月收到研究资金。研究开始前, 我们已获得范德堡大学IRB的伦理批准。 结论: 探索与年龄和性别相关的疼痛处理差异的生物学原因将增加我们对老年人疼痛的了解。缺乏神经生物学证据来支持老年人疼痛管理的最佳实践, 将这些个体置于疼痛管理不善的风险之中。 影响: 老年人疼痛治疗不当是严重的公共卫生问题, 其与生活质量差和保健费用增加有关。了解年龄和性别对整个生命周期内疼痛中枢处理的影响是改善个体化疼痛医学的关键一步。.
Keywords: adult lifespan; experimental pain; functional MRI; nursing; older adults; research protocol; sex-differences.
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
No conflicts of interest have been declared by the authors.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Sex Differences in Brain Regions Modulating Pain Among Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Resting State Functional Connectivity Study.Pain Med. 2018 Sep 1;19(9):1737-1747. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx084. Pain Med. 2018. PMID: 28505337 Free PMC article.
-
Sex differences in psychophysical and neurophysiological responses to pain in older adults: a cross-sectional study.Biol Sex Differ. 2015 Nov 16;6:25. doi: 10.1186/s13293-015-0041-y. eCollection 2015. Biol Sex Differ. 2015. PMID: 26579217 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Alzheimer's Disease on the Resting State Functional Connectivity of Brain Regions Modulating Pain: A Cross Sectional Study.J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;57(1):71-83. doi: 10.3233/JAD-161187. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017. PMID: 28222526 Free PMC article.
-
Thermal Psychophysics and Associated Brain Activation Patterns Along a Continuum of Healthy Aging.Pain Med. 2020 Sep 1;21(9):1779-1792. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz281. Pain Med. 2020. PMID: 31769853 Free PMC article.
-
Sex Differences and Implications for Translational Neuroscience Research: Workshop Summary.Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011. PMID: 21452459 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
A Neuroscience Primer for Integrating Geroscience With the Neurobiology of Aging.J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Jan 7;77(1):e19-e33. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab301. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022. PMID: 34623396 Free PMC article.
-
Promoting successful participation of people living with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in pain-related neuroimaging research studies.Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 19;3:926459. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.926459. eCollection 2022. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36061416 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dyadic Comparison of Pain and Stress in Alzheimer's Disease and Caregivers.Pain Manag Nurs. 2025 Apr;26(2):190-197. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.010. Epub 2024 Dec 4. Pain Manag Nurs. 2025. PMID: 39632151
References
-
- Anderson, A. R. , Deng, J. , Anthony, R. S. , Atalla, S. A. , & Monroe, T. B. (2017). Using complementary and alternative medicine to treat pain and agitation in Dementia: A review of randomized controlled trials from long‐term care with potential use in critical care. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, 29(4), 519–537. 10.1016/j.cnc.2017.08.010 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources