Assessing the clinical accuracy of a hand hygiene system: Learnings from a validation study
- PMID: 33450308
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.01.006
Assessing the clinical accuracy of a hand hygiene system: Learnings from a validation study
Abstract
There is a need to establish validation standards that allow for comparison of automated hand hygiene systems. To assess the accuracy of an innovative monitoring tool (Sani nudge), 2 test nurses performed clinical standard tasks while being observed by 2 infection preventionists. Data from the direct observations were compared with data obtained from the hand hygiene system (Sani nudge) using an independent-event approach. We identified 54 true-positive events (100% system accuracy) and 4 true-negative events (100% system accuracy). No false-positive or false-negative events were identified. We found this approach to be feasible and clinically useful to validate hand hygiene systems in the future.
Keywords: Compliance; Electronic monitoring; Healthcare-acquired; Infection prevention; Nudging; Reminder systems.
Copyright © 2021 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Automated hand hygiene monitoring system validation: Importance evidence overlooked.Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jun;49(6):855-856. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.02.018. Am J Infect Control. 2021. PMID: 34045013 No abstract available.
-
Authors' response.Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jun;49(6):856. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.03.005. Am J Infect Control. 2021. PMID: 34045014 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical