Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 13;28(1):405-416.
doi: 10.3390/curroncol28010043.

National Thoracic Surgery Standards Implementation: Barriers, Enablers, and Opportunities

Angel Arnaout  1   2 , Anubha Prashad  1 , Nadine Dunk  1 , Jess Rogers  1 , Annemarie Edwards  1 , Mary Argent-Katwala  1 , Christian Finley  1   3
Affiliations

National Thoracic Surgery Standards Implementation: Barriers, Enablers, and Opportunities

Angel Arnaout et al. Curr Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis and surgical treatment decision making for thoracic cancers is complex. Moreover, there is demonstrated variability in how each province in Canada delivers cancer care, resulting in disparities in patient outcomes. Recently, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (CPAC) published pan-Canadian evidence-based standards for the care of thoracic surgery cancer patients. This study was undertaken to assess the degree to which these standards were currently met in practice and to further understand the determinants to their implementation nationally.

Methods: This study was undertaken in two parts: (1) a national survey of thoracic surgeons to assess the perceived extent of implementation of these standards in their institution and province; and (2) formation of a focus group with a representative sample of thoracic surgeons across Canada in a qualitative study to understand the determinants of successful standards implementation.

Results: 37 surgeons (33% response rate) participated in the survey; 78% were from academic hospitals. The top categories of standards that were under-implemented included (a) quality assurance processes, data collection and clinician audit and feedback, and (b) ongoing regional planning and workload assessments for thoracic surgeons, and (c) pathology turnaround time target of two weeks and the use of a standardized synoptic pathology report format. Enablers, barriers, and opportunities for standards implementation contextualized the discussion within the focus group.

Conclusion: Study results demonstrated variation in the implementation of surgery standards across Canada and identified the determinants to the delivery of high quality surgical care. Future work will need to include the promotion and development of quality improvement strategies and effective resource allocation that is aligned with the implementation of thoracic cancer surgery standards in order to improve patient outcomes.

Keywords: Thoracic; barriers; cancer; enablers; implementation; standards; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Canadian Partnership against Cancer, System Performance: Lung Cancer Incidence And Mortality Rates. [(accessed on 11 September 2020)]; Available online: https://www.systemperformance.ca/disease-sites/lung/lung-cancer.
    1. Canadian Cancer Society, Esophageal Cancer Statistics. [(accessed on 11 September 2020)];2019 Available online: https://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-type/esophageal/stati....
    1. Canadian Partnership against Cancer, Pan-Canadian Standards for Thoracic Cancer Surgery. [(accessed on 11 September 2020)];2018 Available online: https://s22457.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Pan-Canadian-Standards....
    1. Finley C., Schneider L., Shakeel S., Akhtar-Danesh N., Elit L., Dixon E., Lavis J., Abelson J., Gauvin F.-P., Schuurman N., et al. Approaches to High-Risk, Resource Intensive Cancer Surgical Care in Canada. [(accessed on 11 September 2020)];2015 Available online: https://www.longwoods.com/articles/images/high-risk-resource-intensive-c....
    1. Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of Web surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) J. Med. Internet Res. 2004;6:e34. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources