Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 15;21(1):8.
doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00406-6.

Validity and reliability of the South African Triage Scale in prehospital providers

Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman  1   2 , Julia M Dixon  3 , Taylor Burkholder  4 , Jennifer L Pigoga  5 , Michael Lee  5   6 , Shaheem de Vries  6 , Kubendhren Moodley  6 , Maxene Meier  7 , Kathryn Colborn  8 , Chandni Patel  3 , Lee A Wallis  5   6
Affiliations

Validity and reliability of the South African Triage Scale in prehospital providers

Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman et al. BMC Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: The South African Triage Scale (SATS) is a validated in-hospital triage tool that has been innovatively adopted for use in the prehospital setting by Western Cape Government (WCG) Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in South Africa. The performance of SATS by EMS providers has not been formally assessed. The study sought to assess the validity and reliability of SATS when used by WCG EMS prehospital providers for single-patient triage.

Methods: This is a prospective, assessment-based validation study among WCG EMS providers from March to September 2017 in Cape Town, South Africa. Participants completed an assessment containing 50 clinical vignettes by calculating the three components - triage early warning score (TEWS), discriminators (pre-defined clinical conditions), and a final SATS triage color. Responses were scored against gold standard answers. Validity was assessed by calculating over- and under-triage rates compared to gold standard. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by calculating agreement among EMS providers' responses.

Results: A total of 102 EMS providers completed the assessment. The final SATS triage color was accurately determined in 56.5%, under-triaged in 29.5%, and over-triaged in 13.1% of vignette responses. TEWS was calculated correctly in 42.6% of vignettes, under-calculated in 45.0% and over-calculated in 10.9%. Discriminators were correctly identified in only 58.8% of vignettes. There was substantial inter-rater and gold standard agreement for both the TEWS component and final SATS color, but there was lower inter-rater agreement for clinical discriminators.

Conclusion: This is the first assessment of SATS as used by EMS providers for prehospital triage. We found that SATS generally under-performed as a triage tool, mainly due to the clinical discriminators. We found good inter-rater reliability, but poor validity. The under-triage rate of 30% was higher than previous reports from the in-hospital setting. The over-triage rate of 13% was acceptable. Further clinically-based and qualitative studies are needed.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

Keywords: EMS; Prehospital; SATS; South Africa triage scale; Triage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sample vignette from the SATS written assessment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Accuracy of discriminators used in vignettes
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Mistry B, Stewart De Ramirez S, Kelen G, et al. Accuracy and reliability of emergency department triage using the emergency severity index: an International Multicenter Assessment. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;71(5):581–587.e583. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Twomey M, Wallis LA, Thompson ML, Myers JE. The south African triage scale (adult version) provides reliable acuity ratings when used by doctors and enrolled nursing assistants. Afr J Emerg Med. 2012;2(1):3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2011.08.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fernandes CM, McLeod S, Krause J, et al. Reliability of the Canadian triage and acuity scale: interrater and intrarater agreement from a community and an academic emergency department. CJEM. 2013;15(4):227–232. doi: 10.2310/8000.2013.130943. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jenson A, Hansoti B, Rothman R, de Ramirez SS, Lobner K, Wallis L. Reliability and validity of emergency department triage tools in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Eur J Emerg Med. 2018;25(3):154–160. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000445. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gottschalk SB, Wood D, DeVries S, Wallis LA, Bruijns S. The cape triage score: a new triage system South Africa. Proposal from the cape triage group. Emerg Med J. 2006;23(2):149–153. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.028332. - DOI - PMC - PubMed