Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jan;3(1):100283.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100283. Epub 2020 Nov 28.

Cervical priming before surgical abortion between 14 and 24 weeks: a systematic review and meta-analyses for the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-new clinical guidelines for England

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Cervical priming before surgical abortion between 14 and 24 weeks: a systematic review and meta-analyses for the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-new clinical guidelines for England

Laura E O'Shea et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the optimal cervical priming regimen before surgical abortion between 14+0 and 24+0 weeks' gestation.

Data sources: Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for publications up to February 2020. Experts were consulted for any ongoing or missed trials.

Study eligibility criteria: Randomized controlled trials, published in English after 1985, that compared (1) mifepristone, misoprostol, and osmotic dilators against each other, alone or in combination; (2) different doses of mifepristone and misoprostol; (3) different intervals between priming and abortion; or (4) different routes of administration of misoprostol were included.

Methods: Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration checklist for randomized controlled trials, and data were meta-analyzed in Review Manager 5.3. Dichotomous outcomes were analyzed as risk ratios using the Mantel-Haenszel method, and continuous outcomes were analyzed as mean differences using the inverse variance method. Fixed effects models were used when there was no significant heterogeneity (I2<50%), random effects models were used for moderate heterogeneity (I2≤50% and <80%), and evidence was not pooled when there was high heterogeneity (I2≥80%). Subgroup analyses were undertaken based on parity where available. The overall quality of the evidence was assessed using Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.

Results: A total of 15 randomized controlled trials (N=2454) were included and showed decreased difficulty of procedure and/or increased cervical dilation and decreased patient acceptability with regimens that included dilators compared with those that did not include dilators; increased preoperative expulsion of the pregnancy with sublingual misoprostol and mifepristone compared with sublingual misoprostol alone; increased difficulty of procedure with dilators and misoprostol compared with dilators and mifepristone; decreased difficulty of procedure with dilators and mifepristone compared with dilators alone; and increased cervical dilation when dilators were placed the day before abortion compared with the same day.

Conclusion: Considered alongside clinical expertise, the published data support the use of osmotic dilators, misoprostol, or mifepristone before abortion for pregnancies at 14+0 to 16+0 weeks' gestation; osmotic dilators or misoprostol for pregnancies at 16+1 to 19+0 weeks' gestation; and osmotic dilators alone or with mifepristone for pregnancies at 19+1 to 24+0 weeks' gestation. The effectiveness of pharmacologic agents alone beyond 16+0 weeks' gestation and the optimal timing of dilator placement remain important questions for future research.

Keywords: Dilapan; cervical priming; dilation and evacuation; laminaria; mifepristone; misoprostol; osmotic dilators; second trimester; surgical abortion; vacuum aspiration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources