Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;9(1):e001929.
doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001929.

Intraperitoneal insulin administration in pigs: effect on circulating insulin and glucose levels

Affiliations

Intraperitoneal insulin administration in pigs: effect on circulating insulin and glucose levels

Ilze Dirnena-Fusini et al. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: The effect of intraperitoneal insulin infusion has limited evidence in the literature. Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of different intraperitoneal insulin boluses. There is a lack of studies comparing the insulin appearance in the systemic circulation after intraperitoneal compared with subcutaneous insulin delivery. Thus, we also aimed for a comparison with the subcutaneous route.

Research design and methods: Eight anesthetized, non-diabetic pigs were given three different intraperitoneal insulin boluses (2, 5 and 10 U). The order of boluses for the last six pigs was randomized. Endogenous insulin and glucagon release were suppressed by repeated somatostatin analog injections. The first pig was used to identify the infusion rate of glucose to maintain stable glucose values throughout the experiment. The estimated difference between insulin boluses was compared using two-way analysis of variance (GraphPad Prism V.8).In addition, a trial of three pigs which received subcutaneous insulin boluses was included for comparison with intraperitoneal insulin boluses.

Results: Decreased mean blood glucose levels were observed after 5 and 10 U intraperitoneal insulin boluses compared with the 2 U boluses. No changes in circulating insulin levels were observed after the 2 and 5 U intraperitoneal boluses, while increased circulating insulin levels were observed after the 10 U intraperitoneal boluses. Subcutaneously injected insulin resulted in higher values of circulating insulin compared with the corresponding intraperitoneal boluses.

Conclusions: Smaller intraperitoneal boluses of insulin have an effect on circulating glucose levels without increasing insulin levels in the systemic circulation. By increasing the insulin bolus, a major increase in circulating insulin was observed, with a minor additive effect on circulating glucose levels. This is compatible with a close to 100% first-pass effect in the liver after smaller intraperitoneal boluses. Subcutaneous insulin boluses markedly increased circulating insulin levels.

Keywords: animal experimentation; blood glucose; diabetes mellitus; insulin; type 1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Glucose dynamics. Estimated blood glucose change for the 120 min after intraperitoneal insulin delivery in pigs (mean, SD). The 5 and 10 U intraperitoneal bolus gave significantly higher glucose elevations compared with 2 U intraperitoneal bolus. Insulin boluses: 2 U intraperitoneal insulin bolus (n=7, green line), 5 U intraperitoneal insulin bolus (n=7, blue line) and 10 U intraperitoneal insulin bolus (n=7, red line).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Insulin dynamics. Estimated insulin change for the 120 min after intraperitoneal insulin delivery in pigs (mean, SD). The 10 U intraperitoneal bolus gave significantly higher insulin elevation compared with 2 and 5 U intraperitoneal boluses. Insulin boluses: 2 U intraperitoneal insulin bolus (n=7, green line), 5 U intraperitoneal insulin bolus (n=7, blue line) and 10 U intraperitoneal insulin bolus (n=7, red line).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Insulin change after intraperitoneal and subcutaneous insulin boluses. Estimated insulin changes for the 120 min after intraperitoneal insulin delivery and for the 140 min after subcutaneous insulin delivery in pigs. Statistical testing was not provided based on limited number of included animals. Insulin boluses: 2 U intraperitoneal insulin bolus (n=7, green line), 5 U intraperitoneal insulin bolus (n=7, blue line), 10 U intraperitoneal insulin bolus (n=7, red line), 5 U subcutaneous insulin bolus (n=1, blue dashed line) and 10 U subcutaneous insulin bolus (n=2, red dashed line).

References

    1. Christiansen SC, Fougner AL, Stavdahl Øyvind, et al. . A review of the current challenges associated with the development of an artificial pancreas by a double subcutaneous approach. Diabetes Ther 2017;8:489–506. 10.1007/s13300-017-0263-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farmer TD, Jenkins EC, O'Brien TP, et al. . Comparison of the physiological relevance of systemic vs. portal insulin delivery to evaluate whole body glucose flux during an insulin clamp. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2015;308:E206–22. 10.1152/ajpendo.00406.2014 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dirnena-Fusini I, Åm MK, Carlsen SM. The metabolic effects of continuous Intra-Peritoneal insulin infusion, a systematic review (ePoster). ATTD 2020.
    1. Schade DS, Eaton RP, Friedman NM, et al. . Normalization of plasma insulin profiles with intraperitoneal insulin infusion in diabetic man. Diabetologia 1980;19:35–9. 10.1007/BF00258308 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fischer U, Fritze K, Freyse EJ. Insulin therapy on the peritoneal route: effects on glucose control in experimental insulin dependent diabetes. Exp Clin Endocrinol 1990;95:11–21. 10.1055/s-0029-1210929 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources