Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;42(9):3775-3780.
doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05052-1. Epub 2021 Jan 16.

Cyclophosphamide treatment in active multiple sclerosis

Affiliations

Cyclophosphamide treatment in active multiple sclerosis

Enrique Gómez-Figueroa et al. Neurol Sci. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: Cyclophosphamide (CYC) is an alkylating agent with immunosuppressive effect by inhibiting DNA synthesis and producing apoptosis used in many autoimmune diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS). Here, we analyze the efficacy of CYC treatment in relapsing-remitting (RRMS) and active secondary progressive MS (SPMS) in our center with a monthly scheme.

Methods: Patients with MS treated with CYC and a follow up of at least 36 months were eligible for inclusion. All participants had received a standard CYC regimen. The EDSS score mean annualized relapse rate (ARR) and progression index (PI) were measured as efficacy outcomes at 12, 24, and 36 months. Outcomes were also analyzed comparing disease course and activity.

Results: A total of 16 patients were included (50% male, 18.75% RRMS and 81.25% SPMS). EDSS remained stable along the follow-up period, with 62.5% improving or maintaining the same EDSS score at 12 months. PI decreased 14% and 21% at 12 and 24-36 months of follow-up, respectively. ARR decreased 20% after 12 months, 19% after 24 months, and 30.23% after 36 months. Median differences in ARR were higher in patients with high relapse activity (0.60 vs 0.07, p = 0.001) and malignant course (0.60 vs 0.17, p = 0.027). PI also differed with higher mean differences in patients with high relapse activity (0.70 vs 0.03, p = 0.016) and malignant course (1.17 vs 0.03, p = 0.003).

Conclusions: CYC continues to be a valid therapeutic option, especially in regions with limited access to high-efficiency therapies particularly in patients with high relapsing activity and malignant course.

Keywords: Active multiple sclerosis; Cyclophosphamide; Efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Compston A, Coles A (2008) Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 372:1502–1517. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61620-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J, Hemmer B, Ciccarelli O (2018) Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 391:1622–1636. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30481-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hartung DM (2017) Economics and cost-effectiveness of multiple sclerosis therapies in the USA. Neurotherapeutics. 14:1018–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-017-0566-3 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Ahlmann M, Hempel G (2016) The effect of cyclophosphamide on the immune system: implications for clinical cancer therapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 78:661–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3152-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Awad A, Stue O (2009) Cyclophosphamide in multiple sclerosis: scientific rationale, history and novel treatment paradigms. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756285609344375

Substances

LinkOut - more resources