Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 16;22(1):86.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-03973-8.

The role of lymphocyte-monocyte ratio on axial spondyloarthritis diagnosis and sacroiliitis staging

Affiliations

The role of lymphocyte-monocyte ratio on axial spondyloarthritis diagnosis and sacroiliitis staging

Jing Wang et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Axial spondyloarthritis (axial SpA) is a chronic inflammatory disorder could lead to disability due to the failure of timely treatment. The role of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in axial SpA remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of LMR in axial SpA diagnosis, disease activity classification and sacroiliitis staging.

Methods: Seventy-eight axial SpA patients [51males and 27 females; mean age 41.0 (29-52) years] and 78 healthy controls (HCs) [55males and 23 females; mean age 40 (30-53) years] were enrolled in this study. The diagnosis of axial SpA was performed according to the New York criteria or the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria, whereas the staging of sacroiliitis in axial SpA patients was determined by X-ray examination. Comparisons of LMR levels between groups were performed using t test. Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis were used to assess correlations between LMR and other indicators. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the role of LMR in the diagnosis of axial SpA.

Results: Higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR), red blood cell distribution width(RDW), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio(PLR), mean platelet volume(MPV), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein(CRP) levels and lower red blood cell (RBC), hemoglobin (Hb), Hematocrit (Hct), LMR, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL) and albumin/globulin (A/G) levels were noted in axial SpA patients compared to HCs. Positive correlations were observed between LMR and RBC, Hb, Hct and A/G, whereas negative correlations were found between LMR and NLR, PLR, AST, and TBIL (P < 0.05). ROC curves showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for LMR in the diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis was 0.803 (95% CI = 0.734-0.872) with a sensitivity and specificity of 62.8 and 87.2%, respectively, and the AUC (95% CI) for the combination of ESR, CRP and LMR was 0.975 (0.948-1.000) with a sensitivity and specificity of 94.9 and 97.4%, respectively. LMR levels were lower (P < 0.05) and significant differences in LMR values were observed among different stages (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Our study suggested that LMR might be an important inflammatory marker to identify axial SpA and assess disease activity and X-ray stage of sacroiliitis.

Keywords: Axial spondyloarthritis (axial SpA); Disease activity; Lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR); Stage; X-ray.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no financial or other conflicts of interest in relation to this research and its publication.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Correlations analyses between LMR and different laboratory parameters including A/G, RBC, Hct, Hb, NLR, PLR, AST and TBIL. Pearson’s correlation was used for LMR, RBC and HCT, and Spearman’s correlation was used for other indexes
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of CRP, ESR and LMR in the diagnosis of axial SpA
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
LMR values in axial SpA patients with different X-ray stages. Significantly differences were found between patients with different stages. **: P < 0.01

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Xu Z, Wang X, Zheng Y. Screening for key genes and transcription factors in ankylosing spondylitis by RNA-Seq. Exp Ther Med. 2018;15(2):1394–1402. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arévalo M, Gratacós Masmitjà J, Moreno M, Calvet J, Orellana C, Ruiz D, et al. Influence of HLA-B27 on the Ankylosing Spondylitis phenotype: results from the REGISPONSER database. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018;20(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1724-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stolwijk C, Onna MV, Boonen A, Tubergen AV. The global prevalence of spondyloarthritis: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Arthritis Care Res. 2015;68(9):1320–1331. doi: 10.1002/acr.22831. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bradbury LA, Hollis KA, Gautier B, Shankaranarayana S, Robinson PC, Saad N, et al. Diffusion-weighted Imaging Is a Sensitive and Specific Magnetic Resonance Sequence in the Diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2018;45(6):771–778. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170312. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ostergaard M, Lambert RGW. Imaging in ankylosing spondylitis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2012;4(4):301–311. doi: 10.1177/1759720X11436240. - DOI - PMC - PubMed