Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;50(5):1117-1122.
doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01448-z. Epub 2021 Jan 17.

Balancing ecological conservation with socioeconomic development

Affiliations

Balancing ecological conservation with socioeconomic development

Shixiong Cao et al. Ambio. 2021 May.

Abstract

Ecological restoration and conservation are primary components of sustainable development around the world, particularly during the contemporary era of climate change. However, restoration and conservation are not free; they consume huge amounts of resources that would otherwise support social and economic development. Therefore, excessive conservation creates a risk of creating rather than eliminating poverty. Unfortunately, scientists have largely ignored the balance between these contrasting goals. Here, we discuss the concept of finding the threshold that represents a suitable balance between ecological conservation and economic development, thereby maximizing the benefits for both humans and the environment and promoting sustainable development. To demonstrate the concept, we examined China's ecological restoration achievements and discussed some of the unforeseen negative consequences that accompanied these achievements to discuss how future policies could better balance ecological and socioeconomic goals.

Keywords: Conservation threshold; Conservation trap; Degradation trap; Ecosystem degradation; Environmental conservation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A visual illustration of the relationship between socioeconomic development and environmental restoration or conservation, which can be used to predict the threshold for balanced development. When excessive damage to the ecosystem occurs or excessive protection is provided, socioeconomic development is greatly reduced. The two indexes in this figure are abstract and the choice of index can vary, depending on the goals of a study and the available data, but they must represent quantifiable variables such as vegetation cover or the value of ecosystem services for the ecological index and per capita economic benefits for the socioeconomic index. In the region between points A and B, there is a threshold between ecosystem protection and socioeconomic development, with an acceptable combination of both goals occurring at the top of the inverted-U curve
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
There are three possible conditions for resource exploitation: overutilization, underutilization, and balanced utilization. Each condition leads to different consequences. Overutilization and underutilization of natural resources lead to an imbalance between nature and humans, leading to different forms of the poverty trap: the degradation trap and the conservation trap, respectively. Only balanced utilization of natural resources can achieve sustainable development that meets the needs of both the environment and humans

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bastan M, Khorshid-Doust RR, Sisi SD, Ahmadvand A. Sustainable development of agriculture: A system dynamics model. Kybernetes. 2017;47:142–162. doi: 10.1108/K-01-2017-0003. - DOI
    1. Cao S, Chen L, Zu Q. Remembering the ultimate goal of environmental protection: Including protection of impoverished citizens in China’s environmental policy. Ambio. 2010;39:439–444. doi: 10.1007/s13280-010-0043-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cao S, Chen L, Shankman D, Wang C, Wang X, Zhang H. Excessive reliance on afforestation in China’s arid and semi-arid regions: Lessons in ecological restoration. Earth Science Reviews. 2011;104:240–245. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.11.002. - DOI
    1. Cao S, Suo X, Xia C. Payoff from afforestation under the Three-North Shelter Forest Program. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;256:120461. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120461. - DOI
    1. Cao S, Xia C, Xian J, Guo H, Zheng H. Payoff of the grain for green policy. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2020;57:1180–1188. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13608. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources