Multilevel analysis of factors affecting participants' land reconversion willingness after the Grain for Green Program
- PMID: 33454912
- PMCID: PMC8116479
- DOI: 10.1007/s13280-020-01475-w
Multilevel analysis of factors affecting participants' land reconversion willingness after the Grain for Green Program
Abstract
Understanding the postprogram land use plans of participants is necessary for the sustainability of the conservation achievements from payments for ecosystem services (PES) programs. Previous studies have analyzed many individual factors affecting participants' reconversion plans after PES programs. However, whether the regional ecosystem services changes caused by PES programs affect reconversion willingness remains elusive. Here, we used the multilevel linear model to determine the effects of regional ecosystem services changes and individual characteristics on participants' land reconversion willingness after the Grain for Green Program (GFGP) in the Yanhe watershed of the Loess Plateau. We found that household income, ecological awareness, and employment changes negatively affected reconversion willingness, while nonfarm employment positively affected it at the individual level. At the regional level, the grain production and water yield changes could influence the reconversion willingness of respondents with different individual characteristics. With improved understanding of the factors affecting reconversion willingness, several suggestions to improve the sustainability of the GFGP were proposed. Our study provides a template for analyzing the multilevel factors that affect the sustainability of other PES programs.
Keywords: Grain for Green Program; Loess Plateau; Multilevel linear model; Payments for ecosystem services; Reconversion willingness.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Spatiotemporal pattern of the trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services after Grain for Green Program: a case study of the Loess Plateau, China.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Aug;27(24):30020-30033. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09060-0. Epub 2020 May 23. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020. PMID: 32447724
-
Should I stay or should I go? Farmers' choices to remain in a PES program when policy design changes.J Environ Manage. 2025 Jun;384:125552. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125552. Epub 2025 Apr 30. J Environ Manage. 2025. PMID: 40311363
-
Analysis of the ecological conservation behavior of farmers in payment for ecosystem service programs in eco-environmentally fragile areas using social psychology models.Sci Total Environ. 2016 Apr 15;550:382-390. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.152. Epub 2016 Jan 29. Sci Total Environ. 2016. PMID: 26829672
-
Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 15;105(28):9477-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706436105. Epub 2008 Jul 9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008. PMID: 18621700 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Payments for ecosystem services programs: A global review of contributions towards sustainability.Heliyon. 2023 Nov 17;10(1):e22361. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22361. eCollection 2024 Jan 15. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 38173537 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bryan BA, Gao L, Ye Y, Sun X, Connor JD, Crossman ND, Stafford-Smith M, Wu J, He C, Yu D, Liu Z, Li A, Huang Q, Ren H, Deng X, Zheng H, Niu J, Han G, Hou X. China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency. Nature. 2018;559:193–204. - PubMed
-
- Cao S. Impact of China’s large-scale ecological restoration program on the environment and society in arid and semiarid areas of China: Achievements, problems, synthesis, and applications. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2011;41:317–335.
-
- Cao S, Xu C, Chen L, Wang X. Attitudes of farmers in China’s northern Shaanxi Province towards the land-use changes required under the Grain for Green Project, and implications for the project’s success. Land Use Policy. 2009;26:1182–1194.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources