Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;29(5):780-788.
doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00798-2. Epub 2021 Jan 17.

The ethics of genomic medicine: redefining values and norms in the UK and France

Collaborators, Affiliations

The ethics of genomic medicine: redefining values and norms in the UK and France

Marie Gaille et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 May.

Abstract

This paper presents a joint position of the UK-France Genomics and Ethics Network (UK-FR GENE), which has been set up to reflect on the ethical and social issues arising from the integration of genomics into routine clinical care in the UK and France. In 2018, the two countries announced enhanced cooperation between their national strategies, Genomics England and Plan France Médecine Génomique 2025, which offers a unique opportunity to study the impact of genomic medicine and relevant policies in different national contexts. The paper provides first insights into the two national strategies and the norms, values and principles at stake in each country. It discusses the impact of genomic medicine on established relationships and existing regulations, and examines its effects on solidarity and trust in public healthcare systems. Finally, it uses the social contract as an analytical lens to explore and redefine the balance between individual rights and collective duties in the context of genomic medicine. This paper leads to three key observations: (1) despite each country's strategy being at a different stage of implementation, the two countries face similar ethical issues; (2) each country tries to solve these issues by (re-)defining individual rights and collective duties in its own way; (3) the social contract presents a useful tool to analyse the ways the UK and France address the ethical challenges raised by genomics. This overview lays the groundwork for future in-depth comparison, and drive collaborative research, between the UK and France.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Inserm, Genomics England, Aviesan. Letter of Intent for a Memorandum of Understanding for the French-British Strategic Genomics Research and Development Partnership between the French National Institute For Health and Medical Research (INSERM) and Genomics England Ltd The Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm). 2018.
    1. Gaille M, Horn R. Solidarity and autonomy: two conflicting values in English and French health care and bioethics debates? Theoretical Med Bioethi. 2016;37:441–6. - PubMed
    1. Dheensa S, Samuel G, Lucassen AM, Farsides B. Towards a national genomics medicine service: the challenges facing clinical-research hybrid practices and the case of the 100 000 genomes project. J Med Ethics. 2018;44:397–403. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ballard LM, Horton RH, Dheensa S, Fenwick A, Lucassen AM. Exploring broad consent in the context of the 100,000 Genomes Project: a mixed methods study. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020;28:732–41.. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists, British Society for Genetic Medicine. Consent and confidentiality in genomic medicine: guidance on the use of genetic and genomic information in the clinic. Report of the joint Committee on genomics in medicine. 2019.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources