Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct 13;34(1):63-72.
doi: 10.1080/08998280.2020.1829261.

Antibody tests for COVID-19

Affiliations
Review

Antibody tests for COVID-19

Jonathan Kopel et al. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). .

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 virus caused a globally growing pandemic called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) that has disrupted social, political, and medical environments around the world. Nations are assessing ways to reopen businesses while trying to balance health care risks and economic fallouts. Strategies involving antibody testing have been proposed before phased reopening of the economy. Therefore, assessing the sensitivity and specificity of antibody tests for symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 patients remains paramount to prevent COVID-19 outbreaks. The antibody tests for SARS-CoV-2 detect the presence of IgA, IgM, or IgG antibodies produced by B cells. There are four major types of antibody tests: rapid diagnostic tests, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, neutralization assays, and chemiluminescent immunoassays. Currently, there is no standard antibody test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies during or after exposure or infection. The antibody tests for SARS-CoV-2 have a low specificity within the first week of exposure and increase in the second and third weeks. The current data on antibody tests have several limitations in quality and the presence of bias. Specifically, many antibody tests have a high false-negative rate and a high risk of bias for participant selection, application of index tests, reference standard used, and flow and timing for antibody tests that may incorrectly report the accuracy of COVID-19 antibody tests. In this review, we summarize the current methods, sensitivity/specificity, and gaps in knowledge concerning COVID-19 antibody testing.

Keywords: Antibody; COVID-19; IgG; IgM; SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus; diagnostic tests; sensitivity; specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Commercially available COVID-19 diagnostic antibody tests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weinstein MC, Freedberg KA, Hyle EP, Paltiel AD.. Waiting for certainty on Covid-19 antibody tests—at what cost? N Engl J Med. 2020;383(6):e37. doi:10.1056/NEJMp2017739. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Woloshin S, Patel N, Kesselheim AS. . False negative tests for SARS-CoV-2 infection—challenges and implications. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(6):e38. doi:10.1056/NEJMp2015897. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sullivan PS, Sailey C, Guest JL, et al. . Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and antibodies in diverse samples: protocol to validate the sufficiency of provider-observed, home-collected blood, saliva, and oropharyngeal samples. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(2):e19054. doi:10.2196/19054. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tang Y-W, Schmitz JE, Persing DH, Stratton CW.. Laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19: current issues and challenges. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58(6):e00512. doi:10.1128/JCM.00512-20. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tu Y-P, Jennings R, Hart B, et al. . Swabs collected by patients or health care workers for SARS-CoV-2 testing. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(5):494–496. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2016321. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources