Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Re-evaluation of polydextrose (E 1200) as a food additive

EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) et al. EFSA J. .

Abstract

This opinion deals with the re-evaluation of polydextrose (E 1200) when used as a food additive. The Panel followed the conceptual framework for the risk assessment of certain additives and considered that: adequate exposure estimates were available; the margin of safety (MOS)/margin of exposure (MOE) for arsenic was between 0.5-14 and 8.5 for lead; the exhaustions of the tolerable weekly intake (TWI) for cadmium would be 165%, 10% for mercury, whereas the exhaustion of the tolerable daily intake (TDI) for nickel would be 9%; the absorption is limited and part of polydextrose is fermented in the large intestine into short-chain fatty acids (SCFA); adequate toxicity data were available; there is no concern with respect to genotoxicity; no adverse effects were reported in subchronic studies in rats, dogs or monkeys nor in chronic or carcinogenicity studies in mice and rats at the highest doses tested of up 12,500 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day and 15,000 mg/kg bw per day, respectively; the nephrocalcinosis in dogs given high doses of polydextrose was considered to be a treatment-related but a secondary effect related to diarrhoea, and hence not relevant for the risk assessment; no adverse effects were reported in reproductive or developmental toxicity studies in rats administered up to 10,000 mg polydextrose/kg bw per day, or in a developmental toxicity study in rabbits up to 1,818 mg/kg bw per day (the highest dose tested). Therefore, the Panel concluded that there is no need for numerical acceptable daily intake (ADI) for polydextrose (E 1200), and that there is no safety concern for the reported uses and use levels of polydextrose as a food additive. The Panel recommended that European Commission considers to lower the maximum limit for lead and to introduce limits for arsenic, cadmium and mercury in the EU specifications for polydextrose (E 1200), and to verify that polydextrose-N as a food additive (E 1200) is no longer marketed in the EU.

Keywords: E 1200; food additive; polydextrose; polydextrose‐A; polydextrose‐N.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative polydextrose structure (redrawn from Documentation provided to EFSA n. 1). R stands for hydrogen, sorbitol or the continuation of polydextrose polymer
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Achour L, Flourie B, Briet F, Pellier P, Marteau P and Rambaud JC, 1994. Gastrointestinal effects and energy value of polydextrose in healthy nonobese men. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 59, 1362–1368. - PubMed
    1. Auerbach MH, Craig SAS, Howlett JF and Hayes KC, 2007. Caloric availability of polydextrose. Nutrition Reviews, 65, 544–549. - PubMed
    1. Bachmann W, Haslbeck M and Mehnert H, 1982. Untersuchungen zur diatetischen Verwendung von polydextrose bei diabetikern. Akt. Endokr Stoffw 3.
    1. Bamba T, Fuse K, Chun W and Hosoda S, 1993. Polydextrose and activities of brush‐border membrane enzymes of small‐intestine in rats and glucose‐absorption in humans. Nutrition, 9, 233–236. - PubMed
    1. Beards E, Tuohy K and Gibson G, 2010. Bacterial, SCFA and gas profiles of a range of food ingredients following in vitro fermentation by human colonic microbiota. Anaerobe, 16, 420–425. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources