Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec;9(6):3112-3122.
doi: 10.21037/tau-2019-suc-16.

Minimally invasive radical nephrectomy: a contemporary review

Affiliations
Review

Minimally invasive radical nephrectomy: a contemporary review

Akbar N Ashrafi et al. Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Minimally invasive renal surgery has revolutionized the surgical management of renal cancer since the initial report of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 1991. Laparoscopic nephrectomy became the mainstay of management in surgically resectable renal masses since the 1990s. The growing body of literature supporting nephron-sparing surgery over the last two decades has meant that minimally invasive radical nephrectomy (MI-RN) is now the preferred treatment for renal tumors not amenable to partial nephrectomy. While there is a well-described experience with complex radical nephrectomy using standard laparoscopy, robot-assisted surgery has shortened the learning curve and facilitated greater uptake of minimally invasive surgery in difficult surgical scenarios traditionally performed open surgically. Increased experience and expertise with robot-assisted renal surgery has led to expansion of the indications for MI-RN to include larger masses, locally advanced renal masses invading adjacent tissues or regional hilar/retroperitoneal lymph nodes, cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic disease, and concurrent venous tumor thrombectomy for renal vein or inferior vena cava (IVC) involvement. In this article, we review the various surgical techniques and adjunctive procedures associated with MI-RN.

Keywords: Laparoscopic; minimally invasive (MI); radical nephrectomy (RN); robot-assisted; robotic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-2019-suc-16). The series “Surgery for Urologic Cancers” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020;70:7-30. 10.3322/caac.21590 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robson CJ. Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1963;89:37-42. 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)64494-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W. The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1969;101:297-301. 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)62331-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 1991;146:278-82. 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37770-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Conley SP, Humphreys MR, Desai PJ, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for very large renal tumors (> or =10 cm): is there a size limit? J Endourol 2009;23:57-61. 10.1089/end.2008.0263 - DOI - PubMed