Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;8(1):017001.
doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.1.017001. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

In vitro performance of echoPIV for assessment of laminar flow profiles in a carotid artery stent

Affiliations

In vitro performance of echoPIV for assessment of laminar flow profiles in a carotid artery stent

Astrid M Hoving et al. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: Detailed blood flow studies may contribute to improvements in carotid artery stenting. High-frame-rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound followed by particle image velocimetry (PIV), also called echoPIV, is a technique to study blood flow patterns in detail. The performance of echoPIV in presence of a stent has not yet been studied extensively. We compared the performance of echoPIV in stented and nonstented regions in an in vitro flow setup. Approach: A carotid artery stent was deployed in a vessel-mimicking phantom. High-frame-rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound images were acquired with various settings. Signal intensities of the contrast agent, velocity values, and flow profiles were calculated. Results: The results showed decreased signal intensities and correlation coefficients inside the stent, however, PIV analysis in the stent still resulted in plausible flow vectors. Conclusions: Velocity values and laminar flow profiles can be measured in vitro in stented arteries using echoPIV.

Keywords: carotid; high-frame-rate ultrasound; in vitro; particle image velocimetry; stent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic representation of the experimental flow setup.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Time-averaged SVD-filtered B-mode frame of reference measurement 1 (R1) showing the ROIs of the nonstented region (blue) and stented region (orange) for contrast analysis. The stented area is from lateral position 0 mm to the right border of the image. The black arrow indicates the start of the stent.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Boxplots of the contrast in all measurements. The different subcategories are clustered. Statistical differences within subcategories are indicated with lines above specific measurements. p0.001 applies for all comparisons, unless p-values are noted above the lines.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Boxplots of the contrast in the reference measurements. The line above R1 to R5 shows the statistically significant difference between these two measurements (p=0.006).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Time-averaged velocity vectors (yellow arrows) of reference measurement 1 in nonstented area (blue) and stented area (orange). The velocity vectors are projected on a single SVD filtered frame.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Boxplots of reference measurements showing (a) mean velocities, (b) maximum velocities, and (c) correlation coefficients for nonstented and stented regions. The horizontal lines above the boxplots indicate no significant difference (p>0.05).
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Scatterplot of contrast values in dB per measurement. Each circle represents a contrast measurement of one frame. The color scale ranges from red [timepoint 1 (= 0 s)] to yellow [latest timepoint (=0.17 s)].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brott T. G., et al. , “Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis,” N. Engl. J. Med. 363(1), 11–23 (2010).NEJMAG10.1056/NEJMoa0912321 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonati H., et al. , “Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis,” Cochrane database Syst. Rev. 9(9), CD000515 (2012).10.1002/14651858.CD000515 - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Borst G. J., Naylor A. R., “In the end, it all comes down to the beginning!” Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 50(3), 271–272 (2015).10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.04.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonati L. H., et al. , “Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial,” Lancet 385(9967), 529–538 (2015).LANCAO10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61184-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wentzel J. J., et al. , “Geometry guided data averaging enables the interpretation of shear stress related plaque development in human coronary arteries,” J. Biomech. 38(7), 1551–1555 (2005).JBMCB510.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.06.022 - DOI - PubMed