Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;7(6):1438-1444.
doi: 10.1177/2374373520958340. Epub 2020 Sep 21.

Patient Stories Can Make a Difference in Patient-Centered Research Design

Affiliations

Patient Stories Can Make a Difference in Patient-Centered Research Design

Laurie Lovett Novak et al. J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Amid increasing interest in improving the patient-centeredness of research, new forms of engagement are emerging that enable researchers to get input from community members on research goals, methods, and implementation. This input often includes stories, which are useful for understanding lived experiences of illness and encounters with health care organizations, and for locating these experiences within larger meta-narratives of specific communities. We analyzed the stories in transcripts of 13 Community Engagement Studios and identified 4 major functions that the stories served in the sessions. Major functions included: (1) establishing mutual understanding, (2) adding expansion and depth, (3) characterizing abstract concepts, and (4) providing context for experience, with the latter being the most frequent. We assert that stories can serve to better communicate the complex contexts of patient experiences, helping to align research priorities and research design with community interests, leading to more patient-centered innovations in clinical practice.

Keywords: community engagement; patient-centeredness; research design; storytelling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Chawla NV, Davis DA. Bringing big data to personalized healthcare: a patient-centered framework. J Gen Intern Med 2013;28:660–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bates DW, Bitton A. The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:614–21. - PubMed
    1. Garces JPD, Lopez GJP, Wang Z, Elraiyah TA, Nabhan M, Boehmer K, et al. Eliciting Patient Perspective in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research: A Meta Narrative Systematic Review. Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute; 2012.
    1. Selker HP, Wilkins CH. From community engagement, to community-engaged research, to broadly engaged team science. J Clin Transl Sci. 2017;1:5–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Joosten YA, Israel TL, Williams NA, Boone LR, Schlundt DG, Mouton CP, et al. Community engagement studios: a structured approach to obtaining meaningful input from stakeholders to inform research. Acad Med. 2015;90:1646. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources