The peri-implant phenotype and implant esthetic complications. Contemporary overview
- PMID: 33459483
- DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12709
The peri-implant phenotype and implant esthetic complications. Contemporary overview
Abstract
Objective: To provide a contemporary and comprehensive overview of the hard and soft tissue biological structures surrounding an osseointegrated dental implant (peri-implant referred to as the peri-implant phenotype), in the context of peri-implant esthetic complications.
Overview: The individual components of the peri-implant phenotype (keratinized mucosa width, mucosal thickness, supracrestal tissue height, and the peri-implant buccal bone) have been linked to different aspects of implant esthetics, as well as health-related aspects. At the time of implant therapy, respecting the biology of the peri-implant hard and soft tissues, and anticipating their remodeling patterns can alleviate future esthetic complications.
Conclusions: While the current literature may not allow for a point-by-point evidence based-recommendation for the required amount of each peri-implant structure, bearing in mind the proposed values for the components of the peri-implant phenotype, at the time of and prior to implant therapy can lead to more predictable treatment outcomes, and the avoidance of esthetic complications.
Clinical significance: Knowledge of hard and soft tissue components surrounding and osseointegrated dental implant, and their underlying biological remodeling process is crucial for carrying out a successful therapy and alleviating possible future esthetic challenges.
Keywords: alveolar process; dental implants; esthetics; evidence-based dentistry; gingival recession; periodontics; phenotype.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73:7-21.
-
- Barootchi S, Askar H, Ravida A, Gargallo-Albiol J, Travan S, Wang HL. Long-term clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of full-arch implant-supported zirconia-based and metal-acrylic fixed dental prostheses: a retrospective analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35:395-405.
-
- Ravida A, Wang IC, Barootchi S, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing clinical and patient-reported outcomes between extra-short (</=6 mm) and longer (>/=10 mm) implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46:118-142.
-
- Ravida A, Barootchi S, Askar H, Suarez-Lopez Del Amo F, Tavelli L, Wang HL. Long-term effectiveness of extra-short (</=6 mm) dental implants: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34:68-84.
-
- Gargallo-Albiol J, Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Monje A, Wang HL. Clinical sequelae and patients' perception of dental implant removal: a cross-sectional study. J Periodontol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.200259.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources

