Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021;11(s1):S111-S115.
doi: 10.3233/JPD-202416.

Digital Health Technology to Measure Drug Efficacy in Clinical Trials for Parkinson's Disease: A Regulatory Perspective

Affiliations
Review

Digital Health Technology to Measure Drug Efficacy in Clinical Trials for Parkinson's Disease: A Regulatory Perspective

Leonard Sacks et al. J Parkinsons Dis. 2021.

Abstract

Digital health technology (DHT), including wearable and environmental sensors, video cameras and other electronic tools, has provided new opportunities for the measurement of movement and functionality in Parkinson's disease. Compared to current standards for evaluation of the disease (MDS-UPDRS), DHT may offer new possibilities for more frequent objective measurements of the duration, severity and frequency of disease manifestations over time, that may provide more information than periodic clinic visits. However, DHT measurements are only scientifically and medically useful if they are accurate, reliable and clinically meaningful. Verification and validation, also known as analytical validation and clinical validation, of DHT performance is important to ensure the accuracy and precision of measurements, and the specificity of findings. Given the wide range of clinical manifestations associated with Parkinson's disease and the many tools and metrics to assess them, the challenge is to identify those that may represent a standard for use in clinical trials, and to confirm when digital measurements succeed or fall short of capturing meaningful benefits during drug development.

Keywords: FDA; Parkinson’s disease; digital health technology; drug development; mobile technology; regulatory; wearable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

References

    1. Brognara L, Palumbo P, Grimm B, Palmerini L (2019) Assessing gait in Parkinson’s disease using wearable motion sensors: A systematic review. Diseases 7, 18–32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Esser P, Dawes H, Collett J, Feltham MG, Howells K (2012) Validity and inter-rater reliability of inertial gait measurements in Parkinson’s disease: A pilot study. J Neurosci Methods 205, 177–181. - PubMed
    1. Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, Stebbins GT, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, Poewe W, Sampaio C, Stern MB, Dodel R, Dubois B, Holloway R, Jankovic J, Kulisevsky J, Lang AE, Lees A, Leurgans S, LeWitt PA, Nyenhuis D, Olanow CW, Rascol O, Schrag A, Teresi JA, van Hilten JJ, LaPelle N, Movement Disorder Society UPDRS Revision Task Force (2008) Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord 23, 2129–2170. - PubMed
    1. Seidel SE, Tilley BC, Huang P, Palesch YY, Bergmann KJ, Goetz CG, Swearingen CJ (2012) Subject-investigator reproducibility of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 18, 230–233. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rovini E, Maremmani C, Cavallo F (2017) How wearable sensors can support Parkinson’s disease diagnosis and treatment: A systematic review. Front Neurosci 11, 555–596. - PMC - PubMed